Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19614635›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc2009

Correction for QT/RR hysteresis in the assessment of drug-induced QTc changes--cardiac safety of gadobutrol.

Marek Malik, Katerina Hnatkova, Anna Schmidt, Peter Smetana

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Comparison of Digital 12-Lead ECG and Digital 12-Lead Holter ECG Recordings in Healthy Male Subjects: Results from a Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc · 2016
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Categorization and theoretical comparison of quantitative methods for assessing QT/RR hysteresis.Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc · 2017
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. QT interval variability in body surface ECG: measurement, physiological basis, and clinical value: position statement and consensus guidance endorsed by the European Heart Rhythm Association jointly with the ESC Working Group on Cardiac Cellular Electrophysiology.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Slow QT interval adaptation to heart rate changes in normal ambulatory subjects.Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marek MalikSt. Paul's Cardiac Electrophysiology, London, England. marek.malik@btinternet.com
Katerina Hnatkova
Anna Schmidt
Peter Smetana

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe so-called thorough QT/QTc (TQT) studies required for every new pharmaceutical compound are negative if upper single-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) of placebo and baseline corrected QTc prolongation is <10 ms. This tight requirement has many methodological implications. If the investigated drug has a fast action and ECGs cannot be obtained at stable heart rates, QT/RR hysteresis correction is needed.

methodsThis was used in a TQT study of gadobutrol. The TQT study was a randomized double-blind five-times crossover study of three doses of gadobutrol (0.1, 0.3, and 0.5 mmol/kg) that was placebo and positive effect controlled (moxifloxacin 400 mg). The study enrolled 50 healthy subjects with data of all periods. QT/RR hysteresis was assessed from prestudy exercise test ECGs. Among others, comparisons were made between population heart rate correction without hysteresis considerations and combined population heart rate and hysteresis correction.

resultsThe highest heart rate increase (placebo and baseline controlled) of 13.1 beats per minute (90% CI 9.9-16.4) occurred 1 minute after the administration of the highest dose of gadobutrol. Without hysteresis consideration, the highest DeltaDeltaQTc were 9.91 ms (90% CI 8.01-11.81) while with hysteresis correction, these values were 7.62 ms (90% CI 6.37-8.87), thus turning a marginally positive TQT study into a negative finding.

conclusionHence, omitting hysteresis correction from episodes of fast heart rate changes may lead to incorrect conclusions. Despite substantial rate acceleration, accurate hysteresis correction confirms that gadobutrol does not have any effects on cardiac repolarization that would be within the limits of regulatory relevance.

Indexed as

ElectrocardiographyAdultContrast MediaCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodExercise TestFemaleHeart Conduction SystemHeart RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, CardiovascularOrganometallic CompoundsPlacebosContrast MediagadobutrolOrganometallic CompoundsPlacebos

Identifiers

PMID19614635
PMCPMC6932186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.