Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19613464›Full record

ArticleJournal of insect science (Online)2009

A primer for using transgenic insecticidal cotton in developing countries.

Ann M Showalter, Shannon Heuberger, Bruce E Tabashnik, Yves Carrière, Brad Coates

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of insect science (Online), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Transgenic Improvement for Biotic Resistance of Crops.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Potential shortfall of pyramided transgenic cotton for insect resistance management.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ann M ShowalterDepartment of Entomology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA. ashowalam@mvohio.edu
Shannon Heuberger
Bruce E Tabashnik
Yves Carrière
Brad Coates

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many developing countries face the decision of whether to approve the testing and commercial use of insecticidal transgenic cotton and the task of developing adequate regulations for its use. In this review, we outline concepts and provide information to assist farmers, regulators and scientists in making decisions concerning this technology. We address seven critical topics: 1) molecular and breeding techniques used for the development of transgenic cotton cultivars, 2) properties of transgenic cotton cultivars and their efficacy against major insect pests, 3) agronomic performance of transgenic cotton in developing countries, 4) factors affecting transgene expression, 5) impact of gene flow between transgenic and non-transgenic cotton, 6) non-target effects of transgenic cotton, and 7) management of pest resistance to transgenic cotton.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesInsecticidesAgricultureAnimalsChinaEnvironmentGene FlowGossypiumIndiaInsectaInsecticide ResistancePest ControlPlants, Genetically ModifiedPollinationSouth AfricaInsecticides

Identifiers

PMID19613464
PMCPMC3011844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.