ArticleFamilial cancer2009
Haplotypes of the I157T CHEK2 germline mutation in ethnically diverse populations.
Article in Familial cancer, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Management of individuals with germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in CHEK2: A clinical practice resource of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2023Guideline
- Germline pathogenic variant spectrum and prevalence among colorectal cancer patients undergoing multigene panel testing in Kazakhstan.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Impact of Early Testing and Analysis of Germline Genetic Mutation in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Single Institution Experience.Journal of cancer prevention · 2025Article
- Article
- Review
- Variants in the ATM-CHEK2-BRCA1 axis determine genetic predisposition and clinical presentation of papillary thyroid carcinoma.Genes, chromosomes & cancer · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The CHEK2*I157T missense mutation, reported in ethnically diverse, high-risk families, moderately increases breast and colon cancer risk. The present study assessed whether this mutation represents a founder mutation. Participants identified in high risk clinics or from consecutive cancer patients in Israel, Poland, Latvia, and Finland, were either carriers of the CHEK2*I157T mutation or non-carrier family members. Multi-locus genotyping employed two intragenic markers and five CHEK2 gene flanking markers, spanning about 645 kb. Haplotyping was done when families were available for phasing. Overall, 101 individuals (83 I157T*CHEK2 mutation carriers) were genotyped: 16 Finnish individuals from 11 families (14 mutation carriers, two non-carrier family members), 50 Polish individuals (20 families) (35 carriers, 15 non-carriers), 28 unrelated Latvian mutation carriers, and seven Israeli participants (two families) (six mutation carriers, one non-carrier). Overall 36/83 mutation carriers (43%) were diagnosed with breast cancer, 15/83 (18%)-colon cancer, three-ovarian cancer, one-thyroid cancer, and the rest (n = 28) were asymptomatic. A common core haplotype was detected in all I157T*CHEK2 mutation carriers of Israeli, Polish, and Finnish origin between markers D22S275-D22S689 (approximately 258 kb), with a different allele pattern in Latvians. In conclusion, CHEK2*I157T missense mutation is a founder mutation in ethnically diverse populations, but may also be a mutational hotspot.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.