Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19609623›Full record

Trial reportJournal of general internal medicine2009

Electronic versus dictated hospital discharge summaries: a randomized controlled trial.

David M Maslove, Richard E Leiter, Joshua Griesman, Corinne Arnott, Ophyr Mourad, Chi-Ming Chow, Chaim M Bell

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of general internal medicine, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00670865 (Automated Versus Conventional Hospital Discharge Summaries and Prescriptions), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00670865 nacompletednot on this map

Automated Versus Conventional Hospital Discharge Summaries and Prescriptions: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUnity Health TorontoRan2008 to 2008Enrolled209ConditionsPatient Discharge, Continuity of Patient Care, Medical Records Systems, Computerized, Hospital Information SystemsArmsElectronic discharge summary system
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Design of an orthopaedic-specific discharge summary.BMC health services research · 2016
    Article
  15. Harms from discharge to primary care: mixed methods analysis of incident reports.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2015
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David M MasloveFaculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Richard E Leiter
Joshua Griesman
Corinne Arnott
Ophyr Mourad
Chi-Ming Chow
Chaim M Bell
St. Michael's Hospital · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient care transitions are periods of enhanced risk. Discharge summaries have been used to communicate essential information between hospital-based physicians and primary care physicians (PCPs), and may reduce rates of adverse events after discharge.

objectiveTo assess PCP satisfaction with an electronic discharge summary (EDS) program as compared to conventional dictated discharge summaries.

designCluster randomized trial.

participantsFour medical teams of an academic general medical service. MEASUREMENTS: The primary endpoint was overall discharge summary quality, as assessed by PCPs using a 100-point visual analogue scale. Other endpoints included housestaff satisfaction (using a 100-point scale), adverse outcomes after discharge (combined endpoint of emergency department visits, readmission, and death), and patient understanding of discharge details as measured by the Care Transition Model (CTM-3) score (ranging from 0 to 100).

results209 patient discharges were included over a 2-month period encompassing 1 housestaff rotation. Surveys were sent out for 188 of these patient discharges, and 119 were returned (63% response rate). No difference in PCP-reported overall quality was observed between the 2 methods (86.4 for EDS vs. 84.3 for dictation; P = 0.53). Housestaff found the EDS significantly easier to use than conventional dictation (86.5 for EDS vs. 49.2 for dictation; P = 0.03), but there was no difference in overall housestaff satisfaction. There was no difference between discharge methods for the combined endpoint for adverse outcomes (22 for EDS [21%] vs. 21 for dictation [20%]; P = 0.89), or for patient understanding of discharge details (CTM-3 score 80.3 for EDS vs. 81.3 for dictation; P = 0.81)

conclusionAn EDS program can be used by housestaff to more easily create hospital discharge summaries, and there was no difference in PCP satisfaction.

Indexed as

Medical Records Systems, ComputerizedPatient DischargeAgedAged, 80 and overCluster AnalysisFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInternetMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID19609623
PMCPMC2726886
OpenAlexW2062403736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.