ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2010
3D-QSAR study of c-Src kinase inhibitors based on docking.
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Secretion of Sphinganine by Drug-Induced Cancer Cells and Modified Mimetic Sphinganine (MMS) as c-Src Kinase Inhibitor.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024Article
- Use of QSAR Global Models and Molecular Docking for Developing New Inhibitors of c-src Tyrosine Kinase.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
- Role of MAPK/MNK1 signaling in virus replication.Virus research · 2018Review
- ATP-Binding Pocket-Targeted Suppression of Src and Syk by Luteolin Contributes to Its Anti-Inflammatory Action.Mediators of inflammation · 2015Article
- Combined 3D-QSAR and Docking Modelling Study on Indolocarbazole Series Compounds as Tie-2 Inhibitors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer is a significant world health problem for which efficient therapies are in urgent demand. c-Src has emerged as an attractive target for drug discovery efforts toward antitumor therapies. Toward this target several series of c-Src inhibitors that showed activity in the assay have been reported. In this article, 3D-QSAR models have been built with 156 anilinoquinazoline and quinolinecarbonitrile derivative inhibitors by using CoMFA and CoMSIA methods. These studies indicated that the QSAR models were statistically significant with high predictabilities (CoMFA model, q(2) = 0.590, r(2) = 0.855; CoMSIA model, q(2) = 0.538, r(2) = 0.748). The details of c-Src kinase/inhibitor binding interactions in the crystal structure of complex provided new information for the design of new inhibitors. As a result, docking simulations were also conducted on the series of potent inhibitors. The flexible docking method, which was performed by the DOCK program, positioned all of the inhibitors into the active site to determine the probable binding conformation. The CoMFA and CoMSIA models based on the flexible docking conformations also yielded statistically significant and highly predictive QSAR models (CoMFA model, q(2) = 0.507, r(2) = 0.695; CoMSIA model, q(2) = 0.463, r(2) = 0.734). Our models would offer help to better comprehend the structure-activity relationships that exist for this class of compounds and also facilitate the design of novel inhibitors with good chemical diversity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.