Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19609447›Full record

ArticlePLoS pathogens2009

Drosophila embryos as model systems for monitoring bacterial infection in real time.

Isabella Vlisidou, Andrea J Dowling, Iwan R Evans, Nicholas Waterfield, Richard H ffrench-Constant, Will Wood

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS pathogens, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Phagocyte Responses to Cell Death in Flies.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2020
    Review
  6. Insects · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Isabella VlisidouDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.
Andrea J Dowling
Iwan R Evans
Nicholas Waterfield
Richard H ffrench-Constant
Will Wood
University of Bath · GBUniversity of Exeter · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/C008367/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E021328/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 078400/Z/05/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drosophila embryos are well studied developmental microcosms that have been used extensively as models for early development and more recently wound repair. Here we extend this work by looking at embryos as model systems for following bacterial infection in real time. We examine the behaviour of injected pathogenic (Photorhabdus asymbiotica) and non-pathogenic (Escherichia coli) bacteria and their interaction with embryonic hemocytes using time-lapse confocal microscopy. We find that embryonic hemocytes both recognise and phagocytose injected wild type, non-pathogenic E. coli in a Dscam independent manner, proving that embryonic hemocytes are phagocytically competent. In contrast, injection of bacterial cells of the insect pathogen Photorhabdus leads to a rapid 'freezing' phenotype of the hemocytes associated with significant rearrangement of the actin cytoskeleton. This freezing phenotype can be phenocopied by either injection of the purified insecticidal toxin Makes Caterpillars Floppy 1 (Mcf1) or by recombinant E. coli expressing the mcf1 gene. Mcf1 mediated hemocyte freezing is shibire dependent, suggesting that endocytosis is required for Mcf1 toxicity and can be modulated by dominant negative or constitutively active Rac expression, suggesting early and unexpected effects of Mcf1 on the actin cytoskeleton. Together these data show how Drosophila embryos can be used to track bacterial infection in real time and how mutant analysis can be used to genetically dissect the effects of specific bacterial virulence factors.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacterial ToxinsCell Adhesion MoleculesDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsEmbryo, NonmammalianEnterobacteriaceae InfectionsEscherichia coliHemocytesMicroscopy, FluorescenceMicroscopy, VideoModels, AnimalPhotorhabdusrac GTP-Binding ProteinsBacterial ToxinsCell Adhesion MoleculesDrosophila ProteinsDscam1 protein, DrosophilaRac1 protein, Drosophilarac GTP-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19609447
PMCPMC2707623
OpenAlexW2086209546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.