Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19609264›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Immunology2009

Mechanisms and functions for the duration of intercellular contacts made by lymphocytes.

Daniel M Davis

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Immunology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Natural Killer Cell Mechanosensing in Solid Tumors.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  3. Intercellular Highways in Transport Processes.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. B Cell Aberrance in Lupus: the Ringleader and the Solution.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2022
    Review
  7. Magnetophoretic Micro-Distributor for Controlled Clustering of Cells.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Longitudinal multiparameter assay of lymphocyte interactions from onset by microfluidic cell pairing and culture.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Daniel M DavisDivision of Cell and Molecular Biology, Sir Alexander Fleming Building, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London, SW7 2AZ, UK. d.davis@imperial.ac.uk

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/D011663/1Medical Research Council G0500563
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Communication across intercellular contacts is central to establishing appropriate innate and adaptive immune responses. Recent imaging of lymphocyte interactions suggests that a complex orchestration of cell-cell contact times is a key correlate to establishing appropriate immune responses. Here I review the molecular and cellular processes that influence the duration of intercellular contacts, including integrin activation and dynamic changes in membrane morphology. I discuss how these processes can be regulated, for example, by the balance of activating and inhibitory receptor signals, and how they can establish the appropriate outcome for individual cell-cell interactions.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell AdhesionCell Adhesion MoleculesCell CommunicationCell MembraneHumansImmunity, InnateIntegrinsKiller Cells, NaturalLymphocyte ActivationReceptors, ChemokineSignal TransductionTalinT-Lymphocyte SubsetsCell Adhesion MoleculesIntegrinsReceptors, ChemokineTalin

Identifiers

PMID19609264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.