Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19608684›Full record

Trial reportHaematologica2009

A co-operative evaluation of different methods of detecting BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia on second-line dasatinib or nilotinib therapy after failure of imatinib.

Thomas Ernst, Franz X Gruber, Oliver Pelz-Ackermann, Jacqueline Maier, Markus Pfirrmann, Martin C Müller, Ingvild Mikkola, Kimmo Porkka, Dietger Niederwieser, Andreas Hochhaus and 1 more

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Haematologica, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Thomas ErnstDepartment of Hematology/Oncology/Hemosta seology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Franz X Gruber
Oliver Pelz-Ackermann
Jacqueline Maier
Markus Pfirrmann
Martin C Müller
Ingvild Mikkola
Kimmo Porkka
Dietger Niederwieser
Andreas Hochhaus
Thoralf Lange

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVarious techniques have been employed to detect BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia who are resistant to imatinib. This has led to different reported frequencies of mutations and the finding of a heterogeneous pattern of individual mutations. DESIGN AND

methodsWe compared direct sequencing alone and in combination with denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography and two high-sensitivity allele-specific oligonucleotide polymerase chain reaction approaches for analysis of BCR-ABL mutations in 200 blinded cDNA samples prior to and during second-line dasatinib or nilotinib therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in whom imatinib treatment had failed.

resultsOne hundred and fourteen mutations were detected by both direct sequencing alone or in combination with high performance liquid chromatography and 13 mutations were additionally detected by the combined technique. Eighty of 83 mutations (96%) within a selected panel of 11 key mutations were confirmed by both allele-specific oligonucleotide polymerase chain reaction techniques and 62 mutations were identified in addition to those detected by combined liquid chromatography and direct sequencing, indicating the presence and a high prevalence of low-level mutations in this cohort of patients. Furthermore, 125 mutations were detected by only one allele-specific oligonucleotide polymerase chain reaction technique. Pre-existing mutations were traceable 4.5 months longer and emerging clones were detectable 3.0 months earlier by allele-specific oligonucleotide polymerase chain reaction than by direct sequencing together with liquid chromatography.

conclusionsOur results suggest that denaturing high performance liquid chromatography combined with direct sequencing is a reliable screening technique for the detection of BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations. Allele-specific oligonucleotide polymerase chain reaction further increases the number of detected mutations and indicates a high prevalence of mutations at a low level. The clinical impact of such low-level mutations remains uncertain and requires further investigation. Allele-specific oligonucleotide polymerase chain reaction allows detection of defined mutations at a lower level than does denaturing high performance liquid chromatography combined with direct sequencing and may, therefore, provide clinical benefit by permitting early reconsideration of therapeutic strategies.

Indexed as

MutationAdultAgedBenzamidesDasatinibDNA Mutational AnalysisDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleFusion Proteins, bcr-ablHumansImatinib MesylateLeukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL PositiveMaleMiddle AgedPiperazinesPolymerase Chain ReactionBenzamidesDasatinibFusion Proteins, bcr-ablImatinib MesylatenilotinibPiperazinesProtein Kinase InhibitorsProtein-Tyrosine KinasesPyrimidinesThiazoles

Identifiers

PMID19608684
PMCPMC2738714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.