ArticleJACC. Cardiovascular imaging2009
Outcomes research in cardiovascular imaging: report of a workshop sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
Article in JACC. Cardiovascular imaging, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Outcomes of anatomical versus functional testing for coronary artery disease.The New England journal of medicine · 2015Trial
- PROspective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of chest pain: rationale and design of the PROMISE trial.American heart journal · 2014Trial
- Myocardial viability and survival in ischemic left ventricular dysfunction.The New England journal of medicine · 2011Trial
- Review
- Clinical Effectiveness of Cardiac Noninvasive Diagnostic Testing in Patients Discharged From the Emergency Department for Chest Pain.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2019Article
- Primary diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with unenhanced MRI for patients not eligible for CTPA: Clinical outcome.European journal of radiology open · 2019Article
- Defining Quality in Cardiovascular Imaging: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging · 2017Review
- Comparison of Anatomic and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Alternative Initial Noninvasive Testing Strategies for the Diagnosis of Stable Coronary Artery Disease.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2017Article
- Impact of the Publication of Appropriate Use Criteria on Utilization Rates of Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Studies in Ontario, Canada: A Population-Based Study.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2017Article
- Impact of choice of imaging modality accompanying outpatient exercise stress testing on outcomes and resource use after revascularization for acute coronary syndromes.American heart journal · 2013Article
- Cost-effectiveness analysis for imaging techniques with a focus on cardiovascular magnetic resonance.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2013Review
- Prioritizing comparative effectiveness research for cancer diagnostics using a regional stakeholder approach.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2012Article
- Does imaging-guided selection of patients with ischemic heart failure for high risk revascularization improve identification of those with the highest clinical benefit?: Myocardial imaging should not exclude patients with ischemic heart failure from coronary revascularization.Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging · 2012Article
- Recent advances in the management of chronic stable angina I: approach to the patient, diagnosis, pathophysiology, risk stratification, and gender disparities.Vascular health and risk management · 2010Review
- 2009 ASNC keynote lecture: measuring cost, cost-effectiveness, and quality in cardiovascular imaging.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2010Article
- Adding calcium scoring to myocardial perfusion imaging: Does it alter physicians' therapeutic decision making?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In July of 2008, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute convened experts in noninvasive cardiovascular imaging, outcomes research, statistics, and clinical trials to develop recommendations for future randomized controlled trials of the use of imaging in: 1) screening the asymptomatic patient for coronary artery disease; 2) assessment of patients with stable angina; 3) identification of acute coronary syndromes in the emergency room; and 4) assessment of heart failure patients with chronic coronary artery disease with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. This study highlights several possible trial designs for each clinical situation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.