Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19607789›Full record

ArticleNeuron2009

Shotgun proteomics in neuroscience.

Lujian Liao, Daniel B McClatchy, John R Yates

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuron, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Proteomic Analyses of the Mouse Brain.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Advances in Proteomics Allow Insights Into Neuronal Proteomes.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Molecular basis of the functions of the mammalian neuronal growth cone revealed using new methods.Proceedings of the Japan Academy. Series B, Physical and biological sciences · 2019
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lujian LiaoDepartment of Chemical Physiology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Daniel B McClatchy
John R Yates

Funding

ZDS2P REGULATES SWE1P-DEPENDENT POLARIZED CELL GROWTH IN S CEREVISIAEP41RR011823 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DAVIS, TRACY · 1996 to 2011
$24.7M
La Jolla Interdisciplinary Neuroscience Center Cores - Vital VP30NS057096 · NINDS · SANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INSTITUTE · PI LIPTON, STUART A · 2006 to 2010
$12.7M
Quantitative Proteome Analysis of Brain DevelopmentR01MH067880 · NIMH · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI YATES III, JOHN R · 2003 to 2017
$7.1M
NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR011823NIMH NIH HHS 5R01 MH067880NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH067880NINDS NIH HHS P30 NS057096
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mass spectrometry-based proteomics is increasingly used to address basic and clinical questions in biomedical research through studies of differential protein expression, protein-protein interactions, and posttranslational modifications. The complex structural and functional organization of the human brain warrants the application of high-throughput, systematic approaches to understand the functional alterations under normal physiological conditions and the perturbations of neurological diseases. This primer focuses on shotgun-proteomics-based tandem mass spectrometry for the identification of proteins in a complex mixture. It describes the basic concepts of protein differential expression analysis and posttranslational modification analysis and discusses several strategies to improve the coverage of the proteome.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainDatabases, ProteinHumansMass SpectrometryNeurosciencesProtein Interaction MappingProteomeProteomicsProteome

Identifiers

PMID19607789
PMCPMC2746002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.