ArticleBMC bioinformatics2009
OrthoSelect: a protocol for selecting orthologous groups in phylogenomics.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toward the regularization of E value from BLAST similarity search into a dissimilarity measure as distance function, and the metrication of protein sequence space.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Fast and accurate phylogeny reconstruction using filtered spaced-word matches.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2017Article
- Orthograph: a versatile tool for mapping coding nucleotide sequences to clusters of orthologous genes.BMC bioinformatics · 2017Article
- A novel codon-based de Bruijn graph algorithm for gene construction from unassembled transcriptomes.Genome biology · 2016Article
- Orthology inference in nonmodel organisms using transcriptomes and low-coverage genomes: improving accuracy and matrix occupancy for phylogenomics.Molecular biology and evolution · 2014Article
- Fast alignment-free sequence comparison using spaced-word frequencies.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2014Article
- Bioinformatics analysis of large-scale viral sequences: from construction of data sets to annotation of a phylogenetic tree.Virulence · 2013Review
- Updated clusters of orthologous genes for Archaea: a complex ancestor of the Archaea and the byways of horizontal gene transfer.Biology direct · 2012Article
- Basal jawed vertebrate phylogenomics using transcriptomic data from Solexa sequencing.PloS one · 2012Article
- Insect phylogenomics: exploring the source of incongruence using new transcriptomic data.Genome biology and evolution · 2012Article
- Integrating multi-origin expression data improves the resolution of deep phylogeny of ray-finned fish (Actinopterygii).Scientific reports · 2012Article
- Article
- iPhy: an integrated phylogenetic workbench for supermatrix analyses.BMC bioinformatics · 2011Article
- Drug target prediction and prioritization: using orthology to predict essentiality in parasite genomes.BMC genomics · 2010Article
- BLAST-EXPLORER helps you building datasets for phylogenetic analysis.BMC evolutionary biology · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPhylogenetic studies using expressed sequence tags (EST) are becoming a standard approach to answer evolutionary questions. Such studies are usually based on large sets of newly generated, unannotated, and error-prone EST sequences from different species. A first crucial step in EST-based phylogeny reconstruction is to identify groups of orthologous sequences. From these data sets, appropriate target genes are selected, and redundant sequences are eliminated to obtain suitable sequence sets as input data for tree-reconstruction software. Generating such data sets manually can be very time consuming. Thus, software tools are needed that carry out these steps automatically.
resultsWe developed a flexible and user-friendly software pipeline, running on desktop machines or computer clusters, that constructs data sets for phylogenomic analyses. It automatically searches assembled EST sequences against databases of orthologous groups (OG), assigns ESTs to these predefined OGs, translates the sequences into proteins, eliminates redundant sequences assigned to the same OG, creates multiple sequence alignments of identified orthologous sequences and offers the possibility to further process this alignment in a last step by excluding potentially homoplastic sites and selecting sufficiently conserved parts. Our software pipeline can be used as it is, but it can also be adapted by integrating additional external programs. This makes the pipeline useful for non-bioinformaticians as well as to bioinformatic experts. The software pipeline is especially designed for ESTs, but it can also handle protein sequences.
conclusionOrthoSelect is a tool that produces orthologous gene alignments from assembled ESTs. Our tests show that OrthoSelect detects orthologs in EST libraries with high accuracy. In the absence of a gold standard for orthology prediction, we compared predictions by OrthoSelect to a manually created and published phylogenomic data set. Our tool was not only able to rebuild the data set with a specificity of 98%, but it detected four percent more orthologous sequences. Furthermore, the results OrthoSelect produces are in absolut agreement with the results of other programs, but our tool offers a significant speedup and additional functionality, e.g. handling of ESTs, computing sequence alignments, and refining them. To our knowledge, there is currently no fully automated and freely available tool for this purpose. Thus, OrthoSelect is a valuable tool for researchers in the field of phylogenomics who deal with large quantities of EST sequences. OrthoSelect is written in Perl and runs on Linux/Mac OS X. The tool can be downloaded at (http://gobics.de/fabian/orthoselect.php).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.