Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19603143›Full record

ArticleInvestigational new drugs2010

An in vitro study, evaluating the effect of sunitinib and/or lapatinib on two glioma cell lines.

Efstathia Giannopoulou, Konstantinos Dimitropoulos, Andreas A Argyriou, Angelos K Koutras, Fotinos Dimitrakopoulos, Haralabos P Kalofonos

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Investigational new drugs, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of sunitinib in pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors: a children's oncology group study.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2011
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Efstathia GiannopoulouClinical Oncology Laboratory, Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University Hospital of Patras, Patras Medical School, Rion, 26504, Greece.
Konstantinos Dimitropoulos
Andreas A Argyriou
Angelos K Koutras
Fotinos Dimitrakopoulos
Haralabos P Kalofonos
University of Patras · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimWe sought to assess the effect of sunitinib and lapatinib applied either alone or in combination, on U87 and M059K glioma cells.

methodsBoth cell lines were cultured as recommended by the manufacturer. Sunitinib and lapatinib were applied, either separately or in combination, in the cultured cells after cell attachment at doses of 10 nM, 100 nM, 1 microM and 10 microM. To determine whether the agents affect the proliferation of glioma cells, the 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5 dimethyltetrazolium bromide assay was used. Apoptosis was detected using annexin V/propidium iodide detection assay, migration assay was performed in 24-well microchemotaxis chambers. The release of MMPs into the culture medium of U87 and M059K cells was measured by zymography.

resultsBoth agents, administered either alone or in combination, decreased cell proliferation in a dose-dependent manner 48 h after their application in both cell lines. The inhibition of their combination was statistically different than the inhibition of each agent alone. Apoptosis was increased and migration of U87 and M059K cells was inhibited either by each agent alone or their combination. MMPs levels remained unaffected by the application of both agents in U87 cells. However, MMP-9 and MMP-2 levels were decreased 48 h after treatment of M059K cells with sunitinib either alone or in combination with lapatinib.

conclusionSunitinib and/or lapatinib appear to exhibit significant effects on proliferation, apoptosis and migration of glioma cells. When applied alone, sunitinib appears to be a more potent inhibitor than lapatinib.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsApoptosisCell Line, TumorCell MovementCell ProliferationDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorGliomaHumansIndolesLapatinibMatrix Metalloproteinase 2Matrix Metalloproteinase 9PyrrolesQuinazolinesSunitinibAntineoplastic AgentsIndolesLapatinibMatrix Metalloproteinase 2Matrix Metalloproteinase 9PyrrolesQuinazolinesSunitinib

Identifiers

PMID19603143
OpenAlexW2062069375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.