Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19603005›Full record

ArticleMolecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy2009

Determination of the fate and contribution of ex vivo expanded human bone marrow stem and progenitor cells for bone formation by 2.3ColGFP.

Dezhong Yin, Zhuo Wang, Qinghong Gao, Renuka Sundaresan, Chris Parrish, Qingfen Yang, Paul H Krebsbach, Alexander C Lichtler, David W Rowe, Janet Hock and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Research Progress of Bone Grafting: A Comprehensive Review.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Bone repair cells for craniofacial regeneration.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2012
    Review
  14. The Aastrom experience.Stem cell research & therapy · 2012
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Cell therapy in bone healing disorders.Orthopedic reviews · 2010
    Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Dezhong YinAastrom Biosciences Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105, USA.
Zhuo Wang
Qinghong Gao
Renuka Sundaresan
Chris Parrish
Qingfen Yang
Paul H Krebsbach
Alexander C Lichtler
David W Rowe
Janet Hock
Peng Liu
Aastrom Biosciences (United States) · USUConn Health · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USWest China Hospital of Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone marrow transplantation can provide an effective cell-based strategy to enhance bone repair. However, the fate of implanted cells and the extent of their contribution to bone osteoinduction remain uncertain. To define the fate of bone marrow-derived cells and their contribution in vivo, we used a bone-specific collagen I promoter (2.3Col) driving green fluorescent protein (GFP) (2.3ColGFP) within a lentiviral vector. Prior to in vivo cell fate determination, we verified a high efficiency of lentiviral transduction in human bone marrow stromal cells (hBMSCs), without altering the proliferation or differentiation potential of these cells. We showed that the 2.3ColGFP marker responded to endogenous transcriptional regulation signals. In a mouse ossicle model, we demonstrated that the 2.3ColGFP marker is able to specifically define human bone marrow-derived stem cells that enter the osteoblast lineage in vivo. In addition, cells labeled with 2.3ColGFP with the donor origin, directly make a major contribution to bone formation. Furthermore, we also demonstrated in a calvarial defect model that a mixture of human bone marrow-derived populations, have stronger bone regenerative potential than that of hBMSCs, and an optimal dose is required for bone regeneration by the mixed populations.

Indexed as

Bone Marrow CellsCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationCells, CulturedCollagen Type IFlow CytometryGenetic VectorsGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHumansLentivirusOsteogenesisPromoter Regions, GeneticReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionStem CellsCollagen Type IGreen Fluorescent Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19603005
PMCPMC2835035
OpenAlexW2038580695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.