Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19601762›Full record

ReviewCurrent drug targets2009

The rb pathway and cancer therapeutics.

W Du, J S Searle

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current drug targets, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Combination ofCells · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Identification ofCell journal · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

W DuBen May Department for Cancer Research, The University of Chicago, 929 E. 57th Street, Chicago, IL 60637, USA. wei@uchicago.edu
J S Searle
University of Chicago · US

Funding

Multi-Disciplinary Training Grant in Cancer ResearchT32CA009594 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI KAY F MACLEOD, Scott A. Oakes · 1989 to 2026
$11.5M
Control of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation in the Developing RetinaR01GM074197 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI DU, WEI · 2006 to 2013
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009594NCI NIH HHS T32CA009594NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM074197
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The retinoblastoma gene, Rb, was originally identified as the tumor suppressor gene mutated in a rare childhood cancer called retinoblastoma (reviewed in [1]). Subsequent studies showed that Rb functions in a pathway that is often functionally inactivated in a large majority of human cancers. Interestingly, recent studies showed that in certain types of cancers, Rb function is actually required for cancer development. The intimate link between the Rb pathway and cancer development suggests that the status of Rb activity can potentially be used to develop targeted therapy. However, a prerequisite will be to understand the role of Rb and its interaction with other signaling pathways in cancer development. In this review, we will discuss the roles of Rb in proliferation, apoptosis and differentiation by reviewing the recent findings in both mammalian systems and different model organisms. In addition, we will discuss strategies that can be employed that specifically target cancer cells based on the status of the Rb pathway.

Indexed as

Genes, RetinoblastomaAnimalsApoptosisCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationChildDrug Delivery SystemsHumansRetinal NeoplasmsRetinoblastoma

Identifiers

PMID19601762
PMCPMC3151466
OpenAlexW2021638994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.