ArticleJournal of neurology2009
Prospective study on long-term treatment with oxcarbazepine in pediatric epilepsy.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Epilepsy: recent advances.Journal of neurology · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Following a previous preliminary report on a group of children suffering from partial epilepsies, we present the final considerations on the same group in order to evaluate the long-term efficacy, tolerability and safety of oxcarbazepine (OXC). We enrolled 36 patients (mean age 8.5), between January 2003 and December 2004, with new diagnosis of partial epilepsy: 25 patients were affected by idiopathic partial epilepsy, eight by symptomatic epilepsy and three by cryptogenic epilepsy. Each patient was scheduled to attend the center four times after the initial examination: 3 months (T1), 12 months (T2), 24 (T3) months and 36 (T4) months after the beginning of OXC-monotherapy (T0). At the end of our study, 20 patients were seizure free (SF): nine stopped OXC because of SF for at least 2 years, 11 were still on therapy. One patient showed a reduction of seizure frequency >or=50%, three were non responders (but still on therapy), nine stopped OXC due to a non-responder condition during follow-up before T4 and one because of adverse effects. At the end of the study no EEG focal abnormalities became generalized because of treatment. Normalization of EEG was observed in ten patients. Our preliminary findings have been confirmed. OXC can be considered an effective and well tolerated first line drug for long-term monotherapy in children with epilepsy, both for idiopathic and symptomatic/cryptogenic forms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.