Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19597114›Full record

ArticleArchives of ophthalmology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)2009

Phenotypic variability due to a novel Glu292Lys variation in exon 8 of the BEST1 gene causing best macular dystrophy.

Elliott H Sohn, Peter J Francis, Jacque L Duncan, Richard G Weleber, David A Saperstein, Donald F Farrell, Edwin M Stone

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of ophthalmology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Unilateral BEST1-Associated Retinopathy.American journal of ophthalmology · 2016
    Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy associated with angle-closure glaucoma.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2014
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elliott H SohnDoheny Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA. elliott.sohn@gmail.com
Peter J Francis
Jacque L Duncan
Richard G Weleber
David A Saperstein
Donald F Farrell
Edwin M Stone
Doheny Eye Institute · US

Funding

Rapid-Prototyping and Design CoreP30EY002162 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LAKKARAJU, APARNA · 1985 to 2024
$16.8M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNEI NIH HHS EY002162NEI NIH HHS P30 EY002162
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo study the phenotypic characteristics of patients with a novel p.E292K mutation in BEST1.

methodsAffected individuals underwent ophthalmic examination and testing that included photography, autofluorescence, optical coherence tomography, and electrophysiological testing. Their DNA was analyzed for BEST1 mutations.

resultsFive patients aged 5 to 59 years who expressed the p.E292K mutation in BEST1 were identified in 3 families. Electro-oculographic light-rise was subnormal in all probands and carriers. Carriers had normal findings from fundus examination, multifocal electroretinography, and visual acuity, and were emmetropic or myopic. Only probands had hyperopia and fundus findings typical of Best macular dystrophy. Optical coherence tomography of vitelliform lesions demonstrated retinal pigment epithelium elevation without subretinal fluid; atrophic lesions exhibited disruption of the hyperreflective outer retina-retinal pigment epithelium complex. Intense hyperautofluorescence correlated with the vitelliform lesion.

conclusionsPatients with the Glu292Lys variation in BEST1 exhibit intrafamilial and interfamilial phenotypic variability. A disproportionate fraction (26%) of Best disease-causing mutations occurs in exon 8, suggesting that the portion of protein encoded by this exon (amino acids 290-316) may be especially important to bestrophin's function. Relatively good visual acuity with vitelliform lesions can be explained by preservation of the outer retina, demonstrated by optical coherence tomography. Clinical Relevance A novel mutation in this region of BEST1 carries implications for disease pathogenesis.

Indexed as

Mutation, MissensePoint MutationAdolescentAdultBestrophinsChildChild, PreschoolChloride ChannelsDNA Mutational AnalysisElectrooculographyElectrophysiologyExonsEye ProteinsFemaleFluorescenceGenetic VariationBEST1 protein, humanBestrophinsChloride ChannelsEye ProteinsGlutamineLysine

Identifiers

PMID19597114
PMCPMC2711525
OpenAlexW2020892111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.