Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19596879›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2009

Pharmacodynamics of vancomycin at simulated epithelial lining fluid concentrations against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): implications for dosing in MRSA pneumonia.

Yoriko Harigaya, Jürgen B Bulitta, Alan Forrest, George Sakoulas, Alan J Lesse, Joseph M Mylotte, Brian T Tsuji

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03586362 (Vancomycin De-escalation Therapy in Patients With Pneumonia and Negative MRSA Nasal Swab), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03586362 completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Vancomycin De-escalation Therapy in Patients With Pneumonia and Negative MRSA Nasal Swab

TypeobservationalSponsorCAMC Health SystemRan2018 to 2023Enrolled278ConditionsPneumonia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. DynamicAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Generating Robust and Informative NonclinicalAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2019
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review of vancomycin-induced renal toxicity: an update.Therapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism · 2016
    Review
  14. Optimizing the Clinical Use of Vancomycin.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2016
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yoriko HarigayaLaboratory for Antimicrobial Pharmacodynamics, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences and The New York State Center of Excellence in Bioinformatics & Life Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA.
Jürgen B Bulitta
Alan Forrest
George Sakoulas
Alan J Lesse
Joseph M Mylotte
Brian T Tsuji
University at Buffalo, State University of New York · USAlbany Research Institute · USNew York Medical College · USVA Western New York Healthcare System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little is known regarding killing activity of vancomycin against methicillin (meticillin)-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in pneumonia since the extent of vancomycin penetration into epithelial lining fluid (ELF) has not been definitively established. We evaluated the impact of the extent of ELF penetration on bacterial killing and resistance by simulating a range of vancomycin exposures (24-h free drug area under the concentration-time curve [fAUC24]/MIC) using an in vitro pharmacodynamic model and population-based mathematical modeling. A high-dose, 1.5-g-every-12-h vancomycin regimen according to American Thoracic Society/Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines (trough concentration, 15 mg/liter) with simulated ELF/plasma penetration of 0, 20, 40, 60, 80, or 100% (fAUC24/MIC of 0, 70, 140, 210, 280, or 350) was evaluated against two agr-functional, group II MRSA clinical isolates obtained from patients with a bloodstream infection (MIC = 1.0 mg/liter) at a high inoculum of 10(8) CFU/ml. Despite high vancomycin exposures and 100% penetration, all regimens up to a fAUC24/MIC of 350 did not achieve bactericidal activity. At regimens of < or = 60% penetration (fAUC24/MIC < or = 210), stasis and regrowth occurred, amplifying the development of intermediately resistant subpopulations. Regimens simulating > or = 80% penetration (fAUC24/MIC > or = 280) suppressed development of resistance. Resistant mutants amplified by suboptimal vancomycin exposure displayed reduced rates of autolysis (Triton X-100) at 72 h. Bacterial growth and death were well characterized by a Hill-type model (r2 > or = 0.984) and a population pharmacodynamic model with a resistant and susceptible subpopulation (r2 > or = 0.965). Due to the emergence of vancomycin-intermediate resistance at a fAUC24/MIC of < or = 210, exceeding this exposure breakpoint in ELF may help to guide optimal dosage regimens in the treatment of MRSA pneumonia.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriolysisBronchoalveolar Lavage FluidHumansMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPneumoniaVancomycinAnti-Bacterial AgentsVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID19596879
PMCPMC2737835
OpenAlexW2145115915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.