Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19594925›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2009

Dosage compensation on the active X chromosome minimizes transcriptional noise of X-linked genes in mammals.

Shanye Yin, Ping Wang, Wenjun Deng, Hancheng Zheng, Landian Hu, Laurence D Hurst, Xiangyin Kong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Rapamycin inhibited the function of lung CSCs via SOX2.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2016
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. TRIM29 functions as an oncogene in gastric cancer and is regulated by miR-185.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2015
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. DNA methylation and transcriptional noise.Epigenetics & chromatin · 2013
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Dosage compensation of the sex chromosomes.Annual review of genetics · 2012
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Shanye YinKey Laboratory of Stem Cell Biology, Institute of Health Sciences, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences/Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, South Chongqing Road, Shanghai 200025, PR China.
Ping Wang
Wenjun Deng
Hancheng Zheng
Landian Hu
Laurence D Hurst
Xiangyin Kong
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNShanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences · CNUniversity of Bath · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTheory predicts that haploid-expressed genes should have noisier expression than comparable diploid-expressed ones with the same expression level. However, in mammals there are several classes of gene that are monoallelically expressed, including X-linked genes, imprinted genes and some other autosomal genes. Does it follow that the evolution of X chromosomes in eukaryotes comes at the cost of increased transcriptional noise in the heterogametic sex? Moreover, is escaping X-inactivation in mammalian females associated with an increase in transcriptional variation? To address these questions, we analyze gene expression variation between replicate samples of diverse mammalian cell lines in steady-state using microarray data.

resultsWe observe that transcriptional variation of X-linked genes is no different to that of autosomal genes both before and after control for transcript abundance. By contrast, autosomal genes subject to allelic exclusion do have unusually high noise levels even allowing for their low transcript abundance. The prior theory we suggest was insufficient, at least as regards X-chromosomes, as it failed to appreciate the regulatory complexity of gene expression, not least the effects of genomic neighborhood.

conclusionsThese results suggest that high noise is not a necessary consequence of haploid expression and emphasize the primacy of expression level as a determinant of noise. The latter has consequences for understanding the etiology of haplo-insufficiency and the evolution of gene expression levels. Given the coupling between expression level and noise on the X-chromosome, we suggest that part of the selective advantage of dosage compensation is noise abatement of X-linked genes.

Indexed as

Dosage Compensation, GeneticAlgorithmsAnimalsCell LineDatabases, Nucleic AcidGene Expression ProfilingGenes, X-LinkedHumansMammalsOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisTranscription, GeneticX Chromosome Inactivation

Identifiers

PMID19594925
PMCPMC2728528
OpenAlexW2132452290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.