Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19593591›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2009

Routine assessment of social difficulties in cancer patients: are we opening Pandora's box?

Emma J Podmore, Laura C Bingham, Kathryn M Roberts, Peter J Selby, Penny Wright, Galina Velikova

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Assessing the social impact of cancer: a review of available tools.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2012
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. The Effects of Social Support on Health-Related Quality of Life of Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2016
    Article
  4. Assessment of palliative care cancer patients' most important concerns.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emma J PodmorePsychosocial and Clinical Practice Research Group, Cancer Research UK, St James's Institute of Oncology, Leeds, UK LS9 7TF. e.j.podmore@leeds.ac.uk
Laura C Bingham
Kathryn M Roberts
Peter J Selby
Penny Wright
Galina Velikova

Funding

Cancer Research UK
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

goals of workLiving with cancer impacts on the social aspects of the lives of the patient and their families, causing problems that can remain undetected. The Social Difficulties Inventory (SDI) has been shown as an effective screening tool, but concerns exist that detecting more problems may increase the workload for clinic staff and related services. The aim of this analysis is to assess the level of unmet need for social difficulties and to identify any potential increase in required interventions that may occur as a result of detailed assessment. PATIENTS AND

methodsA previous cross-sectional interview study was conducted to establish the clinical utility of the SDI. Adult patients were recruited from oncology, haematology and chest medicine clinics. They completed the SDI and a semi-structured interview by a social worker, who was blind to the SDI results. With participant agreement, interventions were made for the detected problems. This paper reports on a secondary descriptive analysis of intervention data, which was performed to examine the details of the interventions and referral patterns. MAIN

resultsNo intervention was necessary for 108 (59%) of patients, 42 (23%) received information, 33 (15%) were referred to another service and five (3%) received both information and a referral. Most information was provided about holiday insurance. The majority of referrals were made to Social Work (55% of all referrals) with the main reason being related to benefits or finances.

conclusionsIncreased referral rate was observed following a social work interview, when comparing with local audit data. However, the majority of needs could be met by increasing accessibility of information.

Indexed as

Patient-Centered CareQuality of LifeSickness Impact ProfileSocial ProblemsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedNeeds AssessmentNeoplasms

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.