ArticlePlant physiology2009
Computational identification of potential molecular interactions in Arabidopsis.
Article in Plant physiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genome-wide functional association networks: background, data & state-of-the-art resources.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2020Review
- Predicted Arabidopsis Interactome Resource and Gene Set Linkage Analysis: A Transcriptomic Analysis Resource.Plant physiology · 2018Article
- PTIR: Predicted Tomato Interactome Resource.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Article
- FunCoup 3.0: database of genome-wide functional coupling networks.Nucleic acids research · 2014Article
- Systems analysis of plant functional, transcriptional, physical interaction, and metabolic networks.The Plant cell · 2012Review
- The Arabidopsis thaliana SET-domain-containing protein ASHH1/SDG26 interacts with itself and with distinct histone lysine methyltransferases.Journal of plant research · 2012Article
- Os11Gsk gene from a wild rice, Oryza rufipogon improves yield in rice.Functional & integrative genomics · 2012Article
- Inferring the Brassica rapa Interactome Using Protein-Protein Interaction Data from Arabidopsis thaliana.Frontiers in plant science · 2012Article
- Advances in omics and bioinformatics tools for systems analyses of plant functions.Plant & cell physiology · 2011Review
- Computational identification of protein-protein interactions in rice based on the predicted rice interactome network.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2011Article
- PRIN: a predicted rice interactome network.BMC bioinformatics · 2011Article
- The predicted Arabidopsis interactome resource and network topology-based systems biology analyses.The Plant cell · 2011Article
- PAIR: the predicted Arabidopsis interactome resource.Nucleic acids research · 2011Article
- Global protein interactome exploration through mining genome-scale data in Arabidopsis thaliana.BMC genomics · 2010Article
- Deciphering the Arabidopsis floral transition process by integrating a protein-protein interaction network and gene expression data.Plant physiology · 2010Article
- Mapping plant interactomes using literature curated and predicted protein-protein interaction data sets.The Plant cell · 2010Article
- AtPIN: Arabidopsis thaliana protein interaction network.BMC bioinformatics · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Knowledge of the protein interaction network is useful to assist molecular mechanism studies. Several major repositories have been established to collect and organize reported protein interactions. Many interactions have been reported in several model organisms, yet a very limited number of plant interactions can thus far be found in these major databases. Computational identification of potential plant interactions, therefore, is desired to facilitate relevant research. In this work, we constructed a support vector machine model to predict potential Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) protein interactions based on a variety of indirect evidence. In a 100-iteration bootstrap evaluation, the confidence of our predicted interactions was estimated to be 48.67%, and these interactions were expected to cover 29.02% of the entire interactome. The sensitivity of our model was validated with an independent evaluation data set consisting of newly reported interactions that did not overlap with the examples used in model training and testing. Results showed that our model successfully recognized 28.91% of the new interactions, similar to its expected sensitivity (29.02%). Applying this model to all possible Arabidopsis protein pairs resulted in 224,206 potential interactions, which is the largest and most accurate set of predicted Arabidopsis interactions at present. In order to facilitate the use of our results, we present the Predicted Arabidopsis Interactome Resource, with detailed annotations and more specific per interaction confidence measurements. This database and related documents are freely accessible at http://www.cls.zju.edu.cn/pair/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.