ArticleBMC bioinformatics2009
A comparison of random forest and its Gini importance with standard chemometric methods for the feature selection and classification of spectral data.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 282 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
282 citing papers in PubMed.
- CT texture analysis in histological classification of epithelial ovarian carcinoma.European radiology · 2021Trial
- A multilayer multimodal detection and prediction model based on explainable artificial intelligence for Alzheimer's disease.Scientific reports · 2021Trial
- Monitoring of moisture content in meat emulsion using an SWIR hyperspectral imaging system.Food science of animal resources · 2026Article
- Improving Delirium Prediction in Surgery: Enhanced Machine Learning Models vs. Traditional Risk Scores.Journal of Korean medical science · 2026Article
- Sequence-Derived and Molecular Descriptors for Interpretable Modeling of Molecular Systems: Insights from Peptide Hemolysis.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- m6A target gene signatures reveal immune-related diagnostic biomarkers in systemic sclerosis-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- A method for improving winter wheat mapping accuracy based on multi-temporal feature fusion and stacking ensemble learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Vision based feedback control of weatherstrip coextrusion with predictive dimension modeling.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Application of machine-learning algorithms to identify the key determinants of risk for HIV, hepatitis C and hepatitis B in primary care settings.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Predicting wastewater effects on antibiotic fluorescence from laboratory DOM quenching behavior by fingerprinting and machine learning.RSC advances · 2026Article
- FTIR Spectroscopy of Vitreous Humor for Postmortem Interval Estimation: A Multivariate Regression Approach.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- PETIL: Predicting Expansion of Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes for the Adoptive Cell Immunotherapy in Bladder Cancers.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Machine learning prediction of conduct problems in children using the longitudinal ABCD study.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2026Article
- Data-Driven Soft Sensing for Raw Milk Ethanol Stability Prediction.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- High-accuracy brain tumor detection method based on deep learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Towards real-time pork breed and boar taint classification using rapid evaporative ionisation mass spectrometry.NPJ science of food · 2026Article
- Bypassing pleural aspiration for early tissue diagnosis in suspected pleural malignancy: Development and external validation of a predictive model using supervised machine learning.Qatar medical journal · 2026Article
- BBBper: A Machine Learning-based Online Tool for Blood-brain Barrier (BBB) Permeability Prediction.CNS & neurological disorders drug targets · 2026Article
- Hidden in the Pangenome? Machine Learning-Driven Discovery of Antimicrobial Potential inBioinformatics and biology insights · 2026Article
- Interpretable AI for neural signal decoding in dementia: an EEG ensemble approach to differential diagnosis.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2026Article
222 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRegularized regression methods such as principal component or partial least squares regression perform well in learning tasks on high dimensional spectral data, but cannot explicitly eliminate irrelevant features. The random forest classifier with its associated Gini feature importance, on the other hand, allows for an explicit feature elimination, but may not be optimally adapted to spectral data due to the topology of its constituent classification trees which are based on orthogonal splits in feature space.
resultsWe propose to combine the best of both approaches, and evaluated the joint use of a feature selection based on a recursive feature elimination using the Gini importance of random forests' together with regularized classification methods on spectral data sets from medical diagnostics, chemotaxonomy, biomedical analytics, food science, and synthetically modified spectral data. Here, a feature selection using the Gini feature importance with a regularized classification by discriminant partial least squares regression performed as well as or better than a filtering according to different univariate statistical tests, or using regression coefficients in a backward feature elimination. It outperformed the direct application of the random forest classifier, or the direct application of the regularized classifiers on the full set of features.
conclusionThe Gini importance of the random forest provided superior means for measuring feature relevance on spectral data, but - on an optimal subset of features - the regularized classifiers might be preferable over the random forest classifier, in spite of their limitation to model linear dependencies only. A feature selection based on Gini importance, however, may precede a regularized linear classification to identify this optimal subset of features, and to earn a double benefit of both dimensionality reduction and the elimination of noise from the classification task.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.