ArticleMaternal and child health journal2010
Characteristics, access, utilization, satisfaction, and outcomes of healthy start participants in eight sites.
Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improved birth weight for Black infants: outcomes of a Healthy Start program.American journal of public health · 2014Trial
- Impact of a Community Health Worker (CHW) Home Visiting Intervention on Any and Adequate Prenatal Care Among Ethno-Racially Diverse Pregnant Women of the US Southwest.Maternal and child health journal · 2022Article
- Evaluation of the Implementation of the Healthy Start Program: Findings from the 2016 National Healthy Start Program Survey.Maternal and child health journal · 2019Article
- Trends in Early Prenatal Care Among Women with Pre-Existing Diabetes: Have Income Disparities Changed?Journal of women's health (2002) · 2018Article
- Design and Operation of the Transformed National Healthy Start Evaluation.Maternal and child health journal · 2017Article
- Is Timing of Enrollment Associated with Birth Outcomes? Findings from a Healthy Start Program in Kansas.Maternal and child health journal · 2017Article
- Perinatal program evaluations: methods, impacts, and future goals.Maternal and child health journal · 2015Review
- Selected findings from the cross-site evaluation of the Federal Healthy Start Program.Maternal and child health journal · 2015Article
- Effects of maternity care coordination on pregnancy outcomes: propensity-weighted analyses.Maternal and child health journal · 2015Article
- Maternal health literacy progression among rural perinatal women.Maternal and child health journal · 2014Article
- Moving toward evidence-based federal Healthy Start program evaluations: accounting for bias in birth outcomes studies.American journal of public health · 2014Article
- The impact of SLHS program on perinatal indicators.Maternal and child health journal · 2013Article
- Measuring the impact and outcomes of maternal child health federal programs.Maternal and child health journal · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To describe the characteristics, access, utilization, satisfaction, and outcomes of Healthy Start participants in eight selected sites, a survey of Healthy Start participants with infants ages 6-12-months-old at time of interview was conducted between October 2006 and January 2007. The response rate was 66% (n = 646), ranging from 37% in one site to >70% in seven sites. Healthy Start participants' outcomes were compared to two national benchmarks. Healthy Start participants reported that they were satisfied with the program (>90% on five measures). Level of unmet need was 6% or less for most services, except for dental appointments (11%), housing (13%), and child care (11%). Infants had significantly better access to medical care than did their mothers, with higher rates of insurance coverage, medical homes, and checkups, and fewer unmet needs for health care. Healthy Start participants' rates of ever breastfeeding (72%) and putting infants to sleep on their backs (70%) were at or near the Healthy People 2010 objectives, and considerably higher than rates among low-income mothers in the ECLS. The high rate of health education (>90%) may have contributed to these outcomes. Elimination of smoking among Healthy Start participants (46%) fell short of the Healthy People 2010 objective (99%). The low-birth weight (LBW) rate among Black Healthy Start participants (14%) was three times higher than the rate for Whites and Hispanics (5% each). Overall, the LBW rate in the eight sites (7.5%) was similar to the rate for low-income mothers in the ECLS, but both rates were above the Healthy People 2010 objective (5%). Challenges remain in reducing disparities in maternal and child health outcomes. Further attention to risk factors associated with LBW (especially smoking) may help close the gaps. The life course theory suggests that improved outcomes may require longer-term investments. Healthy Start's emerging focus on interconception care has the potential to address longer-term needs of participants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.