Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19590861›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2009

Dynamic responsiveness of lumbar paraspinal muscle spindles during vertebral movement in the cat.

Dong-Yuan Cao, Partap S Khalsa, Joel G Pickar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Proprioception and Geriatric Low Back Pain.Spine surgery and related research · 2022
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The decreased responsiveness of lumbar muscle spindles to a prior history of spinal muscle lengthening is graded with the magnitude of change in vertebral position.Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology · 2012
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dong-Yuan CaoPalmer College of Chiropractic, Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, 741 Brady St, Davenport, IA 52803, USA.
Partap S Khalsa
Joel G Pickar
Palmer College of Chiropractic · USState University of New York · US

Funding

Vertebral Displacements & Ligament Strains during Simul. Spinal Mani./Gudavalli,RU19AT004137 · NCCIH · PALMER COLLEGE OF CHIROPRACTIC · PI PICKAR, JOEL G · 2007 to 2010
$4.5M
Mechanisms and Effects of Chiropractic ManipulationU19AT002006 · NCCIH · PALMER COLLEGE OF CHIROPRACTIC · PI MEEKER, WILLIAM C · 2003 to 2006
$2.3M
RENOVATION OF PALMER CENTER FOR CHIROPRACTIC RESEARCHC06RR015433 · NCRR · PALMER COLLEGE OF CHIROPRACTIC · PI MEEKER, WILLIAM C · 2000 to 2000
$1.3M
NCCIH NIH HHS U19AT002006NCCIH NIH HHS U19 AT004137NCRR NIH HHS C06 RR15433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Muscle spindles provide essential information for appropriate motor control. In appendicular muscles, much is known about their position and movement sensitivities, but little is known about the axial muscles of the low back. We investigated the dynamic responsiveness of lumbar paraspinal muscle spindle afferents from L(6) dorsal root filaments during constant velocity movement of the L(6) vertebra (the feline has seven lumbar vertebrae) in Nembutal-anesthetized cats. Actuations of 1 mm applied at the L(6) spinous process were delivered at 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 mm/s. The slow velocity component was measured as the slope of the relationship between displacement during the constant velocity ramp and instantaneous discharge frequency. The quick velocity component was the slope's intercept at zero displacement. The peak component was determined as the highest discharge rates occurring near the end of the ramp compared with control. The slow velocity component over the three increasing velocities was 23.9 (9.9), 21.6 (9.6) and 20.5 (9.5) imp/(s mm) [mean (SD)], respectively. The quick velocity component was 28.4 (8.6), 31.4 (9.8) and 35.8 (10.6) imp/s, respectively. These measures of dynamic responsiveness were at least 5-10 times higher compared with values reported for appendicular muscle spindles. The peak component's velocity sensitivity was 2.9 (imp/s)/(mm/s) [0.2, 5.5, lower, upper 95% confidence interval] similar to that for cervical paraspinal muscles as well as appendicular muscles. Increased dynamic responsiveness of lumbar paraspinal muscle spindles may insure central driving to insure control of intervertebral motion during changes in spinal orientation. It may also contribute to large, rapid and potentially injurious increases in paraspinal muscle activity during sudden and unexpected muscle stretch.

Indexed as

Analysis of VarianceAnimalsCatsHypnotics and SedativesLinear ModelsLumbar VertebraeMovementMuscle, SkeletalMuscle SpindlesPentobarbitalTime FactorsHypnotics and SedativesPentobarbital

Identifiers

PMID19590861
OpenAlexW2023049337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.