Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19589167›Full record

ReviewBMC cancer2009

Molecular fingerprinting of radiation resistant tumors: can we apprehend and rehabilitate the suspects?

Charles J Rosser, Micah Gaar, Stacy Porvasnik

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC cancer, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Synergistic Effect of a Mesothelin-TargetedJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2019
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Targeting the Bcl-2 family for cancer therapy.Expert opinion on therapeutic targets · 2013
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Charles J RosserDepartment of Urology, The University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, 32610, USA. charles.rosser@urology.ufl.edu
Micah Gaar
Stacy Porvasnik
University of Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiation therapy continues to be one of the more popular treatment options for localized prostate cancer. One major obstacle to radiation therapy is that there is a limit to the amount of radiation that can be safely delivered to the target organ. Emerging evidence suggests that therapeutic agents targeting specific molecules might be combined with radiation therapy for more effective treatment of tumors. Recent studies suggest that modulation of these molecules by a variety of mechanisms (e.g., gene therapy, antisense oligonucleotides, small interfering RNA) may enhance the efficacy of radiation therapy by modifying the activity of key cell proliferation and survival pathways such as those controlled by Bcl-2, p53, Akt/PTEN and cyclooxygenase-2. In this article, we summarize the findings of recent investigations of radiosensitizing agents in the treatment of prostate cancer.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell ProliferationCell SurvivalCyclooxygenase 2Gene Expression ProfilingHumansMaleMiceNeoplasm TransplantationOligonucleotides, AntisenseProstatic NeoplasmsRadiation-Sensitizing AgentsRadiotherapyRNA, Small InterferingTumor Suppressor Protein p53Cyclooxygenase 2Oligonucleotides, AntisenseRadiation-Sensitizing AgentsRNA, Small InterferingTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID19589167
PMCPMC2719662
OpenAlexW2016800673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.