SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2009
Safety of topical corticosteroids in pregnancy.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Associations of thiazide use with skin cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Low molecular weight heparin for prevention of microvascular occlusion in digital replantation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Safety of topical corticosteroids in pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Does mesh offer an advantage over tissue in the open repair of umbilical hernias? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2010Pooled it
- [Environmental factors of non-syndromic cleft lip and palate].Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2019Article
- Pemphigoid gestationis: current perspectives.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2017Review
- Autoimmune blistering diseases in females: a review.International journal of women's dermatology · 2015Review
- Psoriasis in pregnancy: challenges and solutions.Psoriasis (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2015Review
- The Cochrane Skin Group: a vanguard for developing and promoting evidence-based dermatology.Journal of evidence-based medicine · 2013Article
- Corticosteroid use during pregnancy and risk of orofacial clefts.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTopical corticosteroids are the most frequently prescribed dermatological treatment and are frequently used by pregnant women with skin conditions. However, little is known about their safety in pregnancy.
objectivesTo assess the effects of topical corticosteroids on pregnancy outcomes. SEARCH STRATEGY: On 5th May 2009 we searched the Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2009, Issue 2), MEDLINE (from 2003), and EMBASE (from 2005). We searched LILACS, CINAHL, British Nursing Index, SCI-EXPANDED, BIOSIS Previews, Conference Papers Index, and Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science from inception to May 2009. We scanned the bibliographies of the included studies, published reviews, and articles that had cited the included studies. Pharmaceutical companies that have introduced an original topical corticosteroid product were contacted. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials and cohort studies of topical corticosteroids in pregnant women, and case-control studies comparing maternal exposure to topical corticosteroids between cases and controls were included where outcomes were those we had pre-specified. Outcomes included mode of delivery, congenital abnormality, birthweight, preterm delivery, stillbirth, and low Apgar score. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently applied selection criteria, extracted data, and assessed the quality of the included studies. A third author was available for resolving differences of opinion. MAIN
resultsSeven studies, including 2 cohort and 5 case-control studies, of 659,675 participants were included. We did not undertake a meta-analysis due to considerable methodological heterogeneity. The available data was limited and mainly on orofacial cleft. Most studies did not find significant associations between topical corticosteroids and pregnancy outcomes including mode of delivery, congenital abnormality, preterm delivery, and stillbirth. One study found a significant association between first trimester topical corticosteroid use and orofacial cleft, and another found a significant association between very potent topical corticosteroids and low birthweight. Nevertheless, all the studies had drawbacks, and the quality of evidence was low to very low. AUTHORS'
conclusionsCurrently limited and inconclusive data are unable to detect an association between topical corticosteroids and congenital abnormality, preterm delivery, or stillbirth. The current evidence shows no statistically significant difference between pregnant women who use and those who do not use topical corticosteroids. However, there does appear to be an association of very potent topical corticosteroids with low birthweight. Cohort studies with comprehensive outcome measures, assessment of effects of corticosteroid potency and dose, application methods, and reasons for giving them, and a very large sample size are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.