Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19588414›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2009

Treatment for idiopathic and hereditary neuralgic amyotrophy (brachial neuritis).

Nens van Alfen, Baziel G M van Engelen, Richard A C Hughes

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 171 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Immune triggers preceding neuralgic amyotrophy.European journal of neurology · 2024
    Observational
  14. Neuralgic Amyotrophy.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Reply letter to: If SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is blamed for Parsonage-Turner syndrome, neurosurgical neurolysis is not indicated.Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia · 2024
    Article
  19. A case report of neuralgic amyotrophy.Frontiers in neurology · 2024
    Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nens van AlfenDepartment of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, c/o 920 KNF, PO Box 9101, Nijmegen, Netherlands, 6500 HB.
Baziel G M van Engelen
Richard A C Hughes
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeuralgic amyotrophy (also know as Parsonage-Turner syndrome or brachial plexus neuritis) is a distinct peripheral nervous system disorder characterised by episodes (attacks) of extreme neuropathic pain and rapid multifocal weakness and atrophy in the upper limbs. Neuralgic amyotrophy has both an idiopathic and hereditary form, with similar clinical symptoms but generally an earlier age of onset and more episodes in the hereditary form. The current hypothesis is that the episodes are caused by an immune-mediated response to the brachial plexus. Recovery is slow, in months to years, and many patients are left with residual pain and decreased exercise tolerance of the affected limb(s). Anecdotal evidence suggests that corticosteroids may relieve pain or help improve functional recovery.

objectivesThe objective was to provide a systematic review of all randomised clinical trials of treatment in neuralgic amyotrophy. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Trials Register (April 2 2009), MEDLINE (January 1966 to April 2 2009), EMBASE (January 1980 to April 2 2009), CINAHL (January 1982 to April 2 2009), and LILACS (January 1982 to April 2 2009) for randomised controlled trials of treatment for neuralgic amyotrophy. SELECTION CRITERIA: Any randomised or quasi-randomised trial of any intervention for neuralgic amyotrophy would be included in the review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors extracted the data (RH, NvA) and two authors assessed study quality and performed data extraction independently (NvA, BvE). MAIN

resultsNo randomised or quasi-randomised trials were identified. In 30 articles anecdotal evidence was found on treatment for neuralgic amyotrophy. Only three of these articles contained more than 10 treated cases, with one providing sufficient details to calculate the primary and secondary outcome measures for this review. AUTHORS'

conclusionsAt this moment there is no evidence from randomised trials on any form of treatment for neuralgic amyotrophy. Evidence from one open-label retrospective series suggests that oral prednisone given in the first month after onset can shorten the duration of the initial pain and leads to earlier recovery in some patients. Randomised clinical trials are needed to establish the efficacy of treatment with corticosteroids or other immune-modulating therapies.

Indexed as

Anti-Inflammatory AgentsBrachial Plexus NeuritisGlucocorticoidsHumansPrednisoloneAnti-Inflammatory AgentsGlucocorticoidsPrednisolone

Identifiers

PMID19588414
PMCPMC7212001
OpenAlexW2103349401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.