Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19588384›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2009

Concomitant hyperthermia and radiation therapy for treating locally advanced rectal cancer.

Danielle F M De Haas-Kock, Jeroen Buijsen, Madelon Pijls-Johannesma, Ludy Lutgens, Guido Lammering, Ghislaine A P G van Mastrigt, Dirk K M De Ruysscher, Philippe Lambin, Jacoba van der Zee

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07372300 (The Efficacy of Combination of Modulated Electro-Hyperthermia), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07372300 phase3recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The Efficacy of Combination of Modulated Electro-Hyperthermia(mEHT) in The Multimodality Management in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Multicenter Phase 3 Randomized Control Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorShih-Kai HungRan2025 to 2027Enrolled126ConditionsLocally Advanced Rectal CarcinomaArmsHyperthermia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Should neoadjuvant chemoradiation be combined with regional hyperthermia for rectal cancer?]Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Regional deep hyperthermia in combination with whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in poor prognosis patients with brain metastases.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Feasibility and safety assessment of magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (MRgHIFU)-mediated mild hyperthermia in pelvic targets evaluated using anInternational journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group · 2019
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Organ preservation in rectal cancer - Challenges and future strategies.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2017
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Danielle F M De Haas-KockDepartment of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO clinic), GROW Research Institute, University Medical Center, dr. Tanslaan 12, Maastricht, Netherlands, 6229 ET.
Jeroen Buijsen
Madelon Pijls-Johannesma
Ludy Lutgens
Guido Lammering
Ghislaine A P G van Mastrigt
Dirk K M De Ruysscher
Philippe Lambin
Jacoba van der Zee

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurgery has been the treatment of choice for patients with rectal cancer. For locally advanced cancer results were poor, with high rates of locoregional recurrences and poor overall survival data. Adding (chemo)radiotherapy upfront improved results mainly in locoregional control. Adding hyperthermia to radiotherapy preoperatively might have an equivalent beneficial effect.

objectivesTo quantify the potential beneficial effect of thermo radiation compared to chemo-radiation with respect to pathological complete responses, overall survival and toxicity in rectal cancer therapy. SEARCH STRATEGY: We identified the relevant phase II and III randomised controlled trials in any language trough electronic searches May 2007 of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 1, 2007), the Cochrane Colorectal Cancer Groups Specialised Register, MEDLINE (from 1966), EMBASE (from 1974), CINAHL (from 1982). Furthermore, various trial databases were searched for the identification of recent completed and ongoing trials (metaRegister of Controlled Trials, Cancer Research UK, Cancer.gov, The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trials Database). All studies identified until May 2007 were considered for inclusion in the present study. SELECTION CRITERIA: Only phase II and III randomised controlled clinical trials were included in the analysis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: All identified studies were assessed by two independent reviewers. A weighted estimate of the treatment effect was computed for 2, 3, 4 and 5-year survival, for local tumour recurrence, severe acute and late toxicity and complete tumour response (CR). CR was defined either clinically by disappearance of all pretreatment signs of local tumour or pathologically by microscopically free margins. The risk ratio (RR) and hazard ratio (HR) were used. Analyses were performed with the Reference Manager (RevMan). MAIN

resultsSix RCTs published between 1990 and 2007 were identified. A total number of 520 patients was treated, 258 in the radiotherapy only arm (RT) and 262 in the radiotherapy-hyperthermia arm (RHT). Four studies (424 patients) reported overall survival (OS) rates. After 2 years, OS was significantly better in the RHT group (HR 2.06; 95% CI 1.33-3.17; p=.001), but this difference disappeared after a longer period (3, 4 and 5 year OS). All but one studies reported CR rates. A significant higher CR rate was observed in the RHT group (RR 2.81; 95% CI 1.22-6.45; p=.01). Only 2 studies reported on acute toxicity. In these 2 studies no significant differences were observed between the RT and the RHT group. Late toxicity data were not reported. AUTHORS'

conclusionsFurther studies are needed to compare chemoradiation versus thermoradiation versus chemoradiation plus hyperthermia in well selected/conducted and quality controlled randomised trials.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials, Phase II as TopicClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicCombined Modality TherapyHumansHyperthermia, InducedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRectal Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID19588384
PMCPMC12621083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.