Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19588370›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2009

Adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy for early stage cervical cancer.

Daniela D Rosa, Lídia Rf Medeiros, Maria I Edelweiss, Mary C Bozzetti, Paula R Pohlmann, Airton T Stein, Heather O Dickinson

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy for early stage cervical cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  2. Adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy for early stage cervical cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  3. Radiotherapy and chemoradiation after surgery for early cervical cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Daniela D RosaHospital Femina - Grupo Hospitalar Conceicao, Dinarte Ribeiro 212/83, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, 90570-150.
Lídia Rf Medeiros
Maria I Edelweiss
Mary C Bozzetti
Paula R Pohlmann
Airton T Stein
Heather O Dickinson
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BRGrupo Hospitalar Conceição · BRNewcastle University · GBUniversidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre · BRUniversity of Rio Grande and Rio Grande Community College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with early stage cervical cancer (stages IA2, IB1 or IIA) with risk factors such as lymph node metastasis, lympho vascular space invasion, depth invasion of more than 10mm, microscopic parametrial invasion, non-squamous histology and positive surgical margins have a high risk of recurrence when compared to patients with early stage cervical cancer with no risk factors for recurrence.

objectivesTo evaluate the effectiveness and safety of platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy after radical hysterectomy, radiotherapy, or both in the treatment of early stage cervical cancer (stages IA2, IB1 or IIA). SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Group Trials Register, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) on The Cochrane Library Issue 1, 2009), MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, BIOLOGICAL ABSTRACTS and Cancerlit, the National Research Register and Clinical Trials register, with no language restriction. Abstracts of scientific meetings and the citation lists of included studies and other relevant publications were checked through hand searching and experts in the field were contacted to identify further reports of trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing adjuvant radiotherapy with adjuvant radiotherapy and cisplatin-chemotherapy after radical surgery for early stage cervix cancer were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors extracted data independently to assess whether the studies met the specified inclusion criteria. Any discrepancies were solved by a third and a forth review author. Meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model, with death and disease progression as outcomes. MAIN

resultsThree trials were included. Two trials enrolling 325 participants, of whom 297 (91%) were assessed and compared radiotherapy and chemotherapy with radiotherapy alone found that adjuvant chemotherapy significantly reduced the risk of death (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.36 to 0.87) and disease progression (HR = 0.47, 95%CI: 0.30 to 0.74), with no heterogeneity between trials (I(2) = 0% for both meta-analyses). One trial assessing 71 participants compared chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy with radiotherapy alone and found no significant difference between the two groups (HR = 1.34; 95%CI: 0.24 to 7.66). The median follow up of patients varied from 29 to 42 months. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThe addition of platinum-based chemotherapy to radiotherapy may offer clinical benefit in the adjuvant treatment of early stage cervical cancer with risk factors for recurrence. However, the evidence is limited because the selected studies were quantitatively and qualitatively limited, with small number of patients and limited period of follow-up.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansHysterectomyNeoplasm StagingPlatinum CompoundsRadiotherapy, AdjuvantRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicUterine Cervical NeoplasmsPlatinum Compounds

Identifiers

PMID19588370
OpenAlexW2165931930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.