SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2009
Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 6 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 150 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Feasibility of a Randomised Controlled Trial of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Versus Laparoscopic Sub-Total Hysterectomy
Randomized Clinical Trial About Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence Following Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Laparoscopic vs. Transvaginal Cuff Suturing
Goal Achievement and Patient Satisfaction in Benign Hysterectomy
IV Tranexamic Acid Prior to Hysterectomy for Reduction of Intraoperative Blood Loss: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial
Evaluation of Inflammatory Markers in Single Port Laparoscopic and Vaginal Hysterectomies: A Retrospective Study in Kocaeli, Northwest Turkey
The Effect of Hot Application on Shoulder Pain and Analgesic Use After Laparoscopic Upper Abdominal Surgery
Who cites it
150 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 651 citations in OpenAlex.
- Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Racial disparities in uterine fibroids and endometriosis: a systematic review and application of social, structural, and political context.Fertility and sterility · 2023Pooled it
- Surgery versus medical therapy for heavy menstrual bleeding.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.Journal of minimally invasive gynecology · 2016Pooled it
- Hysterectomy in very obese and morbidly obese patients: a systematic review with cumulative analysis of comparative studies.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2015Pooled it
- Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system versus medical therapy for menorrhagia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2014Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy in Chinese older women with cervical cancer compared with laparoscopic radical hysterectomy.BMC women's health · 2018Trial
- In-Bag Morcellation as a Routine for Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.BioMed research international · 2017Trial
- The new robotic TELELAP ALF-X in gynecological surgery: single-center experience.Surgical endoscopy · 2016Trial
- Trial
- Feasibility and outcome of vaginal paravaginal repair using the Capio suture-capturing device.International urogynecology journal · 2012Trial
- Quality of Communication in Robotic Surgery and Surgical Outcomes.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsTrial
- Article
- Effect of Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Device on Coagulation and Fibrinolysis and Distal Deep Venous Thromboembolism in Patients Undergoing Gynaecology Laparoscopic Surgery During Perioperative Care: A Retrospective Cohort Study.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Article
- Postoperative pain after MiniLap percutaneous versus standard laparoscopic salpingo-oophorectomy: A propensity-matched study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025Article
- Minilaparoscopic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Insights from a Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study with Legal Considerations.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Transvaginal natural orifice endoscopic surgery for hysterectomy: a prospective cohort study.BMC women's health · 2024Article
- Minimally Invasive Injectable Gel for Local Immunotherapy of Liver and Gastric Cancer.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
90 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
- Update of
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe three approaches to hysterectomy for benign disease are abdominal hysterectomy (AH), vaginal hysterectomy (VH), and laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH). Laparoscopic hysterectomy has three further subdivisions depending on the part of the procedure performed laparoscopically.
objectivesTo assess the most beneficial and least harmful surgical approach to hysterectomy for women with benign gynaecological conditions. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Specialised Register of controlled trials (15 August 2008), CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2008, Issue 3), MEDLINE (1950 to August 2008), EMBASE (1980 to August 2008), Biological Abstracts (1969 to August 2008), the National Research Register, and relevant citation lists. SELECTION CRITERIA: Only randomised controlled trials comparing one surgical approach to hysterectomy with another were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Independent selection of trials and data extraction were employed following Cochrane guidelines. MAIN
resultsThere were 34 included studies with 4495 women. The benefits of VH versus AH were speedier return to normal activities (mean difference (MD) 9.5 days), fewer febrile episodes or unspecified infections (odds ratio (OR) 0.42), and shorter duration of hospital stay (MD 1.1 days). The benefits of LH versus AH were speedier return to normal activities (MD 13.6 days), lower intraoperative blood loss (MD 45 cc), a smaller drop in haemoglobin (MD 0.55 g/dl), shorter hospital stay (MD 2.0 days), and fewer wound or abdominal wall infections (OR 0.31) at the cost of more urinary tract (bladder or ureter) injuries (OR 2.41) and longer operation time (MD 20.3 minutes). The benefits of LAVH versus TLH were fewer febrile episodes or unspecified infection (OR 3.77) and shorter operation time (MD 25.3 minutes). There was no evidence of benefits of LH versus VH and the operation time (MD 39.3 minutes) as well as substantial bleeding (OR 2.76) were increased in LH. For some important outcomes, the analyses were underpowered to detect important differences or they were simply not reported in trials. Data were absent for many important long-term outcome measures. AUTHORS'
conclusionsBecause of equal or significantly better outcomes on all parameters, VH should be performed in preference to AH where possible. Where VH is not possible, LH may avoid the need for AH however the length of the surgery increases as the extent of the surgery performed laparoscopically increases. The surgical approach to hysterectomy should be decided by the woman in discussion with her surgeon in light of the relative benefits and hazards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.