SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2009
Mifepristone for induction of labour.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 180 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quality appraisal of systematic reviews on methods of labour induction: a systematic review.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2021Pooled it
- Acupuncture or acupressure for induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Pharmacological and mechanical interventions for labour induction in outpatient settings.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Nitric oxide donors for cervical ripening and induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Vaginal prostaglandin (PGE2 and PGF2a) for induction of labour at term.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- Oral misoprostol for induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- Castor oil, bath and/or enema for cervical priming and induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Methods of induction of labour: a systematic review.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2011Pooled it
- Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010Pooled it
- Different methods for the induction of labour in outpatient settings.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010Pooled it
- Hyaluronidase for cervical ripening and induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2006Pooled it
- Breast stimulation for cervical ripening and induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2005Pooled it
- Oral prostaglandin E2 for induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2001Pooled it
- Outpatient cervical ripening with Foley balloon or mifepristone: Insights into the time taken to reach the active phase of labor.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026Trial
- Article
- Safety and Efficacy of Oral Mifepristone for Cervical Ripening in Single Live Intrauterine Term Unscarred Pregnancies.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2025Article
- The hormonal control of parturition.Physiological reviews · 2024Review
- Article
- Effect of Oral Mifepristone on Modified Bishop's Score in Term Pregnancy.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2024Article
- Results of Induction of Labor with Prostaglandins E1 and E2 (The RIPE Study): A Real-World Data Analysis of Obstetrical Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes of Pharmacological Induction of Labor with Vaginal Inserts.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe steroid hormone, progesterone, inhibits contractions of the pregnant uterus at all gestations. Antiprogestins (including mifepristone) have been developed to antagonise the action of progesterone, and have a recognised role in medical termination of early or mid-trimester pregnancy. Animal studies have suggested that mifepristone may also have a role in inducing labour in late pregnancy.
objectivesTo determine the effects of mifepristone for third trimester cervical ripening or induction of labour. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register and reference lists of relevant papers (May 2009). SELECTION CRITERIA: Clinical trials comparing mifepristone used for third trimester cervical ripening or labour induction with placebo/no treatment or other labour induction methods. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: A strategy was developed to deal with the large volume and complexity of trial data relating to labour induction. This involved a two-stage method of data extraction. For this update, two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. MAIN
resultsTen trials (1108 women) are included. Compared to placebo, mifepristone treated women were more likely to be in labour or to have a favourable cervix at 48 hours (risk ratio (RR) 2.41, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.70 to 3.42) and this effect persisted at 96 hours (RR 3.40, 95% CI 1.96 to 5.92). They were less likely to need augmentation with oxytocin (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.97). Mifepristone treated women were less likely to undergo caesarean section (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.92) but more likely to have an instrumental delivery (RR 1.43, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.96). Women receiving mifepristone were less likely to undergo a caesarean section as a result of failure to induce labour (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.80). There is insufficient evidence to support a particular dose but a single dose of 200 mg mifepristone appears to be the lowest effective dose for cervical ripening (increased likelihood of cervical ripening at 72 hours (RR 2.13, 95% CI 1.15 to 3.97). Abnormal fetal heart rate patterns were more common after mifepristone treatment (RR 1.85, 95% CI 1.17 to 2.93), but there was no evidence of differences in other neonatal outcomes. There is insufficient information on the occurrence of uterine rupture/dehiscence in the reviewed studies. AUTHORS'
conclusionsThere is insufficient information available from clinical trials to support the use of mifepristone to induce labour. However, the studies suggest that mifepristone is better than placebo in reducing the likelihood of caesarean sections being performed for failed induction of labour; therefore, this may justify future trials comparing mifepristone with the routine cervical ripening agents currently in use. There is little information on effects on the baby.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.