Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19588116›Full record

ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2009

Comparison of quantitative metabolite imaging tools and carbon-13 techniques for fluxomics.

Totte Niittylae, Bhavna Chaudhuri, Uwe Sauer, Wolf B Frommer

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Infrared Microimaging of Sucrose Distribution in Plant Vascular Tissues.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Totte NiittylaeDepartment of Plant Biology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, CA, USA.
Bhavna Chaudhuri
Uwe Sauer
Wolf B Frommer

Funding

Sugar signaling networks detected by high content fluxomicxR01DK079109 · NIDDK · CARNEGIE INSTITUTION OF WASHINGTON, D.C. · PI FROMMER, WOLF B · 2007 to 2010
$2.1M
NIDDK NIH HHS 1R01DK079109-01NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK079109
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent development of analytic technologies allows fast analysis of metabolism in real time. Fluxomics aims to define the genes involved in regulation of flux through a metabolic or signaling pathway. Flux through a metabolic or signaling pathway is determined by the activity of its individual components; regulation can occur at many levels, including transcriptional, posttranslational, and allosteric levels. Currently two technologies are used to monitor fluxes. The first is pulse labeling of the organism with a tracer such as C13, followed by mass spectrometric analysis of the partitioning of label into different compounds. The second approach is based on the use of flux sensors, proteins that respond with a conformational change to ligand binding. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) detects the conformational change and serves as a proxy for ligand concentration. Both methods provide high time resolution. In contrast to mass spectrometry assays, FRET nanosensors monitor only a single compound, but the advantage of FRET nanosensors is that they yield data with cellular and subcellular resolution.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisBiological TransportCarbon IsotopesFluorescence Resonance Energy TransferImage Processing, Computer-AssistedIsotope LabelingMetabolic Networks and PathwaysMetabolomicsPlantsSoftwareCarbon Isotopes

Identifiers

PMID19588116
PMCPMC3000467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.