ArticleJournal of human hypertension2010
The optimal home blood pressure monitoring schedule based on the Didima outcome study.
Article in Journal of human hypertension, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent status of self-measured home blood pressure in the Japanese general population: a modern database on self-measured home blood pressure (MDAS).Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2020Pooled it
- The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension (JSH 2019).Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2019Guideline
- Self-blood pressure monitoring in an urban, ethnically diverse population: a randomized clinical trial utilizing the electronic health record.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2015Trial
- Patient self-monitoring of blood pressure and self-titration of medication in primary care: the TASMINH2 trial qualitative study of health professionals' experiences.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2013Trial
- Use of Different Blood Pressure Thresholds to Reduce the Number of Home Blood Pressure Monitoring Days Needed for Detecting Hypertension.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2023Article
- Predictive power of home blood pressure in the evening compared with home blood pressure in the morning and office blood pressure before treatment and in the on-treatment follow-up period: a post hoc analysis of the HOMED-BP study.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2022Article
- Reproducibility of nighttime home blood pressure measured by a wrist-type nocturnal home blood pressure monitoring device.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2021Article
- Home blood pressure monitoring: methodology, clinical relevance and practical application: a 2021 position paper by the Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring and Cardiovascular Variability of the European Society of Hypertension.Journal of hypertension · 2021Article
- Peak blood pressure-guided monitoring may serve as an effective approach for blood pressure control in the out-of-office setting.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2020Article
- Measurement of Blood Pressure in Humans: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2019Review
- Number of Measurements Needed to Obtain a Reliable Estimate of Home Blood Pressure: Results From the Improving the Detection of Hypertension Study.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2018Article
- Optimal schedule of home blood-pressure measurements for the diagnosis of hypertension.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2018Article
- Comparison between L-type and N/L-type calcium channel blockers in the regulation of home blood-pressure variability in elderly hypertensive patients.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2018Article
- The impact of unrecorded readings on the precision and diagnostic performance of home blood pressure monitoring: a statistical study.Journal of human hypertension · 2018Article
- Home blood pressure and cardiovascular risk in treated hypertensive patients: the prognostic value of the first and second measurements and the difference between them in the HONEST study.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2016Observational
- Within-Home Blood Pressure Variability on a Single Occasion Has Clinical Significance.Pulse (Basel, Switzerland) · 2016Review
- Clinical Practice of Two Measurements of Home Blood Pressure on Each Occasion in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.Cardiorenal medicine · 2015Article
- Clinical significance of home blood pressure and its possible practical application.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2014Review
- Determinants of the Morning-Evening Home Blood Pressure Difference in Treated Hypertensives: The HIBA-Home Study.International journal of hypertension · 2014Article
- Rationale, study design, baseline characteristics and blood pressure at 16 weeks in the HONEST Study.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated the optimal schedule for home blood pressure (HBP) monitoring that has the greatest prognostic ability and provides the most reliable assessment of HBP. The Didima study assessed the value of HBP (duplicate morning and evening measurements, 3 days) in predicting cardiovascular events in the general population (662 adults, 8.2+/-0.2 years follow-up). Criteria for the optimal monitoring schedule were stabilization of mean HBP, its variability (standard deviation (s.d.)) and hazard ratios (HRs) of cardiovascular events per 1 mm Hg HBP increase. By averaging more readings (1-12), there was a progressive decline in average HBP and its s.d. and increase in HR, with most of these benefits achieved on the second day (8 readings) and little additional benefit obtained on the third day (12 readings). The first day gave higher and more unstable HBP values (higher s.d.) with less prognostic ability (lower HR). The first HBP readings per occasion gave higher values but with similar prognostic ability as the second readings taken 1 min later. There was little difference in average HBP between morning and evening readings with no prognostic superiority of morning readings. In conclusion, by averaging more readings the average HBP and its variability are reduced and the prognostic ability improved. Any aspect of HBP monitoring (first or second readings, morning or evening) has similar prognostic ability. The first day gives higher and unstable values with lower prognostic ability and should be better discarded. These data validate the HBP monitoring schedule proposed by the European Society of Hypertension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.