Credit where credit is overdue.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Bioinformatics Resources for Plant Abiotic Stress Responses: State of the Art and Opportunities in the Fast Evolving -Omics Era.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
   Review
2. Ten Simple Rules for Taking Advantage of Git and GitHub.PLoS computational biology · 2016
   Article
3. Exploring the potential of public proteomics data.Proteomics · 2016
   Review
4. Making proteomics data accessible and reusable: current state of proteomics databases and repositories.Proteomics · 2015
   Review
5. ProteomeXchange provides globally coordinated proteomics data submission and dissemination.Nature biotechnology · 2014
   Article
6. Data management strategies for multinational large-scale systems biology projects.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2014
   Review
7. GigaDB: promoting data dissemination and reproducibility.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2014
   Article
8. Making research data repositories visible: the re3data.org Registry.PloS one · 2013
   Article
9. The PRoteomics IDEntification (PRIDE) Converter 2 framework: an improved suite of tools to facilitate data submission to the PRIDE database and the ProteomeXchange consortium.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2012
   Article
10. Adventures in data citation: sorghum genome data exemplifies the new gold standard.BMC research notes · 2012
    Article
11. The mzIdentML data standard for mass spectrometry-based proteomics results.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2012
    Article
12. Toward interoperable bioscience data.Nature genetics · 2012
    Article
13. Recombinant protein quality evaluation: proposal for a minimal information standard.Standards in genomic sciences · 2011
    Article
14. Proteomics data repositories: providing a safe haven for your data and acting as a springboard for further research.Journal of proteomics · 2010
    Review
15. The Proteomics Identifications database: 2010 update.Nucleic acids research · 2010
    Article
16. Accreditation and attribution in data sharing.Nature biotechnology · 2009
    Article
17. Post-publication sharing of data and tools.Nature · 2009
    Article
18. Prepublication data sharing.Nature · 2009
    Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Accreditation and attribution in data sharing.2009

Authors and funding

0 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as