Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19587285›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2009

Maximal voluntary fingertip force production is not limited by movement speed in combined motion and force tasks.

Kevin G Keenan, Veronica J Santos, Madhusudhan Venkadesan, Francisco J Valero-Cuevas

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Numerical instability of Hill-type muscle models.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Neuromuscular control: from a biomechanist's perspective.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kevin G KeenanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Division of Biokinesiology and Physical Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089, USA.
Veronica J Santos
Madhusudhan Venkadesan
Francisco J Valero-Cuevas

Funding

Structure &function of the fingers tendinous apparatusR01AR052345 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI VALERO-CUEVAS, FRANCISCO J · 2005 to 2017
$3.7M
Control of finger movement and force for precision pinchR01AR050520 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI VALERO-CUEVAS, FRANCISCO J · 2004 to 2014
$2.9M
Developing a clinically useful measure of dynamic pinchR21HD048566 · NICHD · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI VALERO-CUEVAS, FRANCISCO J · 2005 to 2006
$374k
NIAMS NIH HHS AR05020NIAMS NIH HHS AR052345NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR050520NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR052345NICHD NIH HHS HD048566NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD048566
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous studies of limbs and fingers propose that force-velocity properties of muscle limit maximal voluntary force production during anisometric tasks, i.e., when muscles are shortening or lengthening. Although this proposition appears logical, our study on the simultaneous production of fingertip motion and force disagrees with this commonly held notion. We asked eight consenting adults to use their dominant index fingertip to maximize voluntary downward force against a horizontal surface at specific postures (static trials), and also during an anisometric "scratching" task of rhythmically moving the fingertip along a 5.8 +/- 0.5 cm target line. The metronome-timed flexion-extension movement speed varied 36-fold from "slow" (1.0 +/- 0.5 cm/s) to "fast" (35.9 +/- 7.8 cm/s). As expected, maximal downward voluntary force diminished (44.8 +/- 15.6%; p = 0.001) when any motion (slow or fast) was added to the task. Surprisingly, however, a 36-fold increase in speed did not affect this reduction in force magnitude. These remarkable results for such an ordinary task challenge the dominant role often attributed to force-velocity properties of muscle and provide insight into neuromechanical interactions. We propose an explanation that the simultaneous enforcement of mechanical constraints for motion and force reduces the set of feasible motor commands sufficiently so that force-velocity properties cease to be the force-limiting factor. While additional work is necessary to reveal the governing mechanisms, the dramatic influence that the simultaneous enforcement of motion and force constraints has on force output begins to explain the vulnerability of dexterous function to development, aging, and even mild neuromuscular pathology.

Indexed as

AdultBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleFingersHumansMaleMovementMuscle, SkeletalPsychomotor PerformanceTime FactorsWeight-BearingYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID19587285
PMCPMC2763542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.