ArticleHNO2009
[Cluster immunotherapy of persistent allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. Safety aspects of induction therapy with mite depot allergen preparations].
Article in HNO, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cluster subcutaneous allergen specific immunotherapy for the treatment of allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2014Pooled it
- [Immunology of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps as a basis for treatment with biologicals].HNO · 2019Review
- Article
- Safety aspects of subcutaneous immunotherapy with multiple allergens--a retrospective analysis on polysensitized patients.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2010Article
- Safety aspects of Cluster immunotherapy with semi-depot allergen extracts in seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundApart from allergen avoidance and pharmacotreatment, specific immunotherapy (SIT) is the most important therapeutic option offered to allergic patients. Clinical efficacy of SIT depends on the specific allergen extract used, the quality and total cumulative amount of allergen applied and the treatment schedule of the therapy. In cluster SIT, 2-3 injections per treatment day are applied resulting in an accelerated achievement of the maintenance dose. PATIENTS AND
methodsIn this study 79 mite-sensitized adult allergic patients aged 18 to 59 years (mean 27.4+/-7.2 years) were investigated in terms of side-effects of cluster SIT during induction treatment.
resultsA total of 129 local hypersensitivity reactions (>grade 1) occurred or 10.2% of all injections (69% grade 1, 20% grade 2, 11% grade 3 and no grade 4 reactions). The total number of systemic reactions was 40 or 3.2% of all injections with 92% grade 1 and 8% grade 2 reactions. Grade 3 or 4 reactions did not occur.
conclusionCluster SIT with depot allergens represents an interesting alternative option to conventional dosage schedules of SIT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.