Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19584245›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2009

DNA-binding specificity and in vivo targets of Caenorhabditis elegans nuclear factor I.

Christina M Whittle, Elena Lazakovitch, Richard M Gronostajski, Jason D Lieb

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Nutrient-DrivenFrontiers in endocrinology · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Principles of allosteric interactions in cell signaling.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2014
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Transcriptional regulation of gene expression in C. elegans.WormBook : the online review of C. elegans biology · 2013
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Fast, sensitive discovery of conserved genome-wide motifs.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2012
    Article
  17. Seeing elegance in gene regulatory networks of the worm.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2011
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Gene-centered regulatory network mapping.Methods in cell biology · 2011
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christina M WhittleDepartment of Biology, Carolina Center for Genome Sciences, and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3280, USA.
Elena Lazakovitch
Richard M Gronostajski
Jason D Lieb
University at Buffalo, State University of New York · USUNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Roles of NFI Genes in Mouse Lung DevelopmentR01HL080624 · NHLBI · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI GRONOSTAJSKI, RICHARD M · 2007 to 2011
$2.0M
UNC Developmental Biology Training ProgramT32HD046369 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MAGNUSON, TERRY R · 2005 to 2009
$1.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS 5R01HL080624-02NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL080624NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD046369
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The conserved nuclear factor I (NFI) family of transcription factors is unique to animals and essential for mammalian development. The Caenorhabditis elegans genome encodes a single NFI family member, whereas vertebrate genomes encode 4 distinct NFI protein subtypes (A, B, C, and X). NFI-1-deficient worms exhibit abnormalities, including reduced lifespan, defects in movement and pharyngeal pumping, and delayed egg-laying. To explore the functional basis of these phenotypes, we sought to comprehensively identify NFI-1-bound loci in C. elegans. We first established NFI-1 DNA-binding specificity using an in vitro DNA-selection strategy. Analysis yielded a consensus motif of TTGGCA(N)(3)TGCCAA, which occurs 586 times in the genome, a 100-fold higher frequency than expected. We next asked which sites were occupied by NFI-1 in vivo by performing chromatin immunoprecipitation of NFI-1 followed by microarray hybridization. Only 55 genomic locations were identified, an unexpectedly small target set. In vivo NFI-1 binding sites tend to be upstream of genes involved in core cellular processes, such as chromatin remodeling, mRNA splicing, and translation. Remarkably, 59 out of 70 (84%) of the C. briggsae orthologs of the identified targets contain conserved NFI binding sites in their promoters. These experiments provide a foundation for understanding how NFI-1 is recruited to unexpectedly few in vivo sites to perform its developmental functions, despite a vast over-representation of its binding motif.

Indexed as

Amino Acid MotifsAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsBase SequenceBinding SitesCaenorhabditis elegansCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsConsensus SequenceConserved SequenceDNA, HelminthGenes, HelminthGenomeHumansMiceMolecular Sequence DataNFI Transcription FactorsCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsDNA, Helminthnfi-1 protein, C elegansNFI Transcription FactorsNucleosomes

Identifiers

PMID19584245
PMCPMC2715542
OpenAlexW2165818226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.