Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19583841›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2009

Increased levels of active c-Src distinguish invasive from in situ lobular lesions.

Donghui Zou, Han-Seung Yoon, Ahmad Anjomshoaa, David Perez, Ryuji Fukuzawa, Parry Guilford, Bostjan Humar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Molecular drivers of lobular carcinoma in situ.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2015
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Donghui ZouCancer Genetics Laboratory, Biochemistry Department, University of Otago, 710 Cumberland St, Dunedin 9054, Aotearoa New Zealand. donghui.zou@otago.ac.nz
Han-Seung Yoon
Ahmad Anjomshoaa
David Perez
Ryuji Fukuzawa
Parry Guilford
Bostjan Humar
University of Otago · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMounting molecular evidence suggests that invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is developing from in situ lesions, atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH), and lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS). However, little is known about the mechanisms promoting the progression of lobular breast cancer (LBC) to invasive disease. Here, we investigated whether c-Src kinase, an established inducer of invasive states, contributes to the progression from ALH/LCIS to ILC.

methodsImmunochemistry for c-Src and other cancer-related molecules was performed on archived tissue specimens from 57 LBC patients. Relative c-Src activity was estimated by comparing fluorescence intensity of ILC with that of adjacent ALH/LCIS and nonneoplastic epithelia after staining with an antibody against active c-Src. Expression of active c-Src was correlated with markers of invasion and malignancy and with relapse among LBC patients.

resultsLevels of activated c-Src were increased in ILC relative to ALH/LCIS (1.63-fold +/- 0.24 SD) and nonneoplastic epithelia (1.47 +/- 0.18 SD). Increased c-Src levels correlated with the activation of c-Src downstream targets (Fak, Stat-3) and the expression of mesenchymal markers. ILC cells with activated c-Src co-expressed metastatic markers (Opn, Cxcr4) and included cells positive for the cancer stem cell marker Aldh1. A tendency for high c-Src levels (P = 0.072) was observed among the seven LBC patients with relapsed disease.

conclusionsOur data indicate elevated c-Src activity in ILC relative to noninvasive neoplastic tissue. The associated molecular changes suggest that c-Src promotes LBC invasiveness by inducing an epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Therefore, c-Src antagonists might counteract the acquisition of invasiveness during LBC progression. Inhibition of c-Src may also affect ILC cells thought to have a high metastatic potential and to be capable of initiating/maintaining tumor growth. Together with the possible association between high c-Src levels and disease recurrence, our findings encourage the evaluation of c-Src antagonists for the treatment of LBC.

Indexed as

Aldehyde DehydrogenaseAldehyde Dehydrogenase 1 FamilyBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCadherinsCarcinoma in SituCarcinoma, LobularCell LineageCell TransdifferentiationDisease ProgressionDrug Delivery SystemsEpithelial CellsFemaleFocal Adhesion Kinase 1HumansHyperplasiaAldehyde DehydrogenaseAldehyde Dehydrogenase 1 FamilyALDH1A1 protein, humanBiomarkers, TumorCadherinsFocal Adhesion Kinase 1IsoenzymesNeoplasm ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins pp60(c-src)PTK2 protein, humanRetinal DehydrogenaseSTAT3 protein, humanSTAT3 Transcription FactorVimentin

Identifiers

PMID19583841
PMCPMC2750104
OpenAlexW2061099439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.