ReviewDrugs2009
Torasemide prolonged release.
Review in Drugs, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Torasemide prolonged release (PR), a high-ceiling diuretic, inhibits renal tubular reabsorption of sodium and chloride in the thick ascending limb of the loop of Henle. Relative to the immediate-release (IR) formulation, the PR formulation of torasemide was associated with similar systemic exposure, but significantly slower rates of absorption and lower fluctuations in plasma concentrations, and provided higher natriuretic efficiency and more constant diuresis. The antihypertensive efficacy of once-daily torasemide PR 5-10 mg was noninferior to that of once-daily torasemide IR 5-10 mg with regard to the change from baseline in sitting diastolic BP (primary endpoint) in a 12-week, randomized, double-blind trial in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Sitting systolic BP (SBP) decreased from baseline to a similar extent in the overall population of the treatment groups at week 12. However, daytime SBP decreased to a significantly greater extent with torasemide PR than IR in a subgroup of patients who underwent ambulatory 24-hour BP monitoring. Patients receiving torasemide PR were more likely to achieve adequate control of BP at weeks 8 and 12 than those receiving torasemide IR. The PR formulation of torasemide was well tolerated in the clinical trial, with a tolerability profile that was similar to that with the IR formulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.