Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19582396›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine2009

The 'Consent to Research' paradigm in critical care: challenges and potential solutions.

Karen E A Burns, Celia Zubrinich, John Marshall, Deborah Cook

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Consent models in Canadian critical care randomized controlled trials: a scoping review.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Barriers and challenges in the process of including critically ill patients in clinical studies.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2020
    Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Perspectives on a Multidisciplinary Team Approach to Implementation of Planned Emergent Use Research.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2015
    Article
  12. Understanding the global epidemiology of pediatric critical illness: the power, pitfalls, and practicalities of point prevalence studies.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2014
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Karen E A BurnsInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, St Michael's Hospital, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5B-1W8, Canada. burnsk@smh.toronto.on.ca
Celia Zubrinich
John Marshall
Deborah Cook

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchCritical CareHumansThird-Party Consent

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.