Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19582210›Full record

ArticleHippokratia2007

Is pepsin detected in the saliva of patients who experience pharyngeal reflux?

A Printza, M Speletas, S Triaridis, J Wilson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hippokratia, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02274636 (Study of a Dietary Supplement for Reflux During Sleep), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02274636 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Study of a Dietary Supplement for Reflux During Sleep

TypeinterventionalSponsorOral Care Research Associates, SeattleRan2014 to 2016Enrolled50ConditionsGERDArmsXylitol
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pepsin in Saliva as a Diagnostic Marker for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Meta-Analysis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Pepsin in saliva as a diagnostic biomarker in laryngopharyngeal reflux: a meta-analysis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. New developments in extraesophageal reflux disease.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A Printza2nd Otolaryngology Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Papageorgiou Hospital, Greece. nan@med.auth.gr
M Speletas
S Triaridis
J Wilson
Papageorgiou General Hospital · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate if pepsin is detected, with an activity assay, in the saliva of patients with a clinical diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and can therefore be used as a diagnostic marker of laryngopharyngeal reflux. STUDY

designPilot, prospective study.

methodsAdult participants with a clinical diagnosis of LPR collected whole saliva samples on regular intervals for a day, and upon experiencing symptoms attributed to LPR. Patients were selected on the basis of presence of severe symptoms and laryngoscopic findings of laryngopharyngeal reflux and symptoms of gastroesopharyngeal reflux. They reported voice disorders, dysphagia, throat clearing, excessive secretions, breathing difficulties, cough, globus sensation and throat pain. Control participants reported the absence of pharyngeal and laryngeal symptoms and of symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux. Saliva samples were assayed with fibrinogen on an agarose gel plate. The detection of pepsin was based on the presence of peptic activity which was qualitatively evaluated.

resultsThe control participants had negative assays. No saliva samples from the LPR patients, collected at regular sampling, tested positive for pepsin. All the samples collected at the presence of symptoms and following regurgitation episodes tested negative for pepsin. Saliva samples pH ranged from 7 to 8.

conclusionsPepsin was not detected, with an activity assay, in the saliva of patients with a clinical diagnosis of LPR. A concentration method might be more sensitive although saliva and swallowing physiology renders the detection of pepsin in the saliva difficult.

Indexed as

diagnosisgastroesophageal refluxlaryngitislaryngopharyngeal refluxpepsinsaliva

Identifiers

PMID19582210
PMCPMC2658799
OpenAlexW2221061181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.