Trial reportCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne2009
Individualized electronic decision support and reminders to improve diabetes care in the community: COMPETE II randomized trial.
Trial report in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00813085 (A Randomized Trial of Electronic Integration of Care for Better Diabetes Outcomes; The COMPETE II Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 116 papers, 29 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized Trial of Electronic Integration of Care for Better Diabetes Outcomes; The COMPETE II Study
Who cites it
116 citing papers in PubMed, 29 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 234 citations in OpenAlex.
- Methods to derive composite indicators used for quality and safety measurement and monitoring in healthcare: a scoping review.Frontiers in health services · 2026Pooled it
- Quality improvement strategies for diabetes care: Effects on outcomes for adults living with diabetes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- The Effectiveness of Telemedicine Solutions for the Management of Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2023Pooled it
- Effectiveness of the chronic care model for adults with type 2 diabetes in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Effectiveness of Remotely Delivered Interventions to Simultaneously Optimize Management of Hypertension, Hyperglycemia and Dyslipidemia in People With Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Pooled it
- Adult patient access to electronic health records.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Impact of providing patients access to electronic health records on quality and safety of care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ quality & safety · 2020Pooled it
- Diabetes Care and Management Using Electronic Medical Records: A Systematic Review.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2019Pooled it
- The effect of computerized decision support systems on cardiovascular risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2019Pooled it
- The Impact of Patient Online Access to Computerized Medical Records and Services on Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2018Pooled it
- Comprehensive process model of clinical information interaction in primary care: results of a "best-fit" framework synthesis.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2018Pooled it
- Effects of consumer-oriented health information technologies in diabetes management over time: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2017Pooled it
- Effect of telemedicine on glycated hemoglobin in diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2017Pooled it
- Impact of Information Technology-Based Interventions for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus on Glycemic Control: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2016Pooled it
- Web-Based Interventions Targeting Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Middle-Aged and Older People: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2016Pooled it
- Clinical Decision Support Systems and Prevention: A Community Guide Cardiovascular Disease Systematic Review.American journal of preventive medicine · 2015Pooled it
- Computer-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems and Patient-Reported Outcomes: A Systematic Review.The patient · 2015Pooled it
- The impact of interventions on appointment and clinical outcomes for individuals with diabetes: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2015Pooled it
- Effectiveness of computerized clinical decision support systems for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care: a systematic review.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2014Pooled it
- Effectiveness of computerized decision support systems linked to electronic health records: a systematic review and meta-analysis.American journal of public health · 2014Pooled it
56 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiabetes mellitus is a complex disease with serious complications. Electronic decision support, providing information that is shared and discussed by both patient and physician, encourages timely interventions and may improve the management of this chronic disease. However, it has rarely been tested in community-based primary care.
methodsIn this pragmatic randomized trial, we randomly assigned adult primary care patients with type 2 diabetes to receive the intervention or usual care. The intervention involved shared access by the primary care provider and the patient to a Web-based, colour-coded diabetes tracker, which provided sequential monitoring values for 13 diabetes risk factors, their respective targets and brief, prioritized messages of advice. The primary outcome measure was a process composite score. Secondary outcomes included clinical composite scores, quality of life, continuity of care and usability. The outcome assessors were blinded to each patient's intervention status.
resultsWe recruited sequentially 46 primary care providers and then 511 of their patients (mean age 60.7 [standard deviation 12.5] years). Mean follow-up was 5.9 months. The process composite score was significantly better for patients in the intervention group than for control patients (difference 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-1.75, p < 0.001); 61.7% (156/253) of patients in the intervention group, compared with 42.6% (110/258) of control patients, showed improvement (difference 19.1%, p < 0.001). The clinical composite score also had significantly more variables with improvement for the intervention group (0.59, 95% CI 0.09-1.10, p = 0.02), including significantly greater declines in blood pressure (-3.95 mm Hg systolic and -2.38 mm Hg diastolic) and glycated hemoglobin (-0.2%). Patients in the intervention group reported greater satisfaction with their diabetes care.
interpretationA shared electronic decision-support system to support the primary care of diabetes improved the process of care and some clinical markers of the quality of diabetes care. (ClinicalTrials.gov trial register no. NCT00813085.).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.