Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19581461›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2009

Didanosine population pharmacokinetics in West African human immunodeficiency virus-infected children administered once-daily tablets in relation to efficacy after one year of treatment.

Déborah Hirt, Christophe Bardin, Serge Diagbouga, Boubacar Nacro, Hervé Hien, Emmanuelle Zoure, François Rouet, Adama Ouiminga, Saik Urien, Vincent Foulongne and 3 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Analysis ofJournal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2012
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Déborah HirtEA3620, Université Paris-Descartes, Paris, France. deborah.hirt@univ-paris5.fr
Christophe Bardin
Serge Diagbouga
Boubacar Nacro
Hervé Hien
Emmanuelle Zoure
François Rouet
Adama Ouiminga
Saik Urien
Vincent Foulongne
Philippe Van De Perre
Jean-Marc Tréluyer
Philippe Msellati
Centre Muraz · BFInstitut Alfred Fournier · FRWest African Health Organisation · BFAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRHôpital Cochin · FRUniversité de Montpellier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our objective was to study didanosine pharmacokinetics in children after the administration of tablets, the only formulation available in Burkina Faso for which data are missing, and to establish relationships between doses, plasma drug concentrations, and treatment effects (efficacy/toxicity). Didanosine concentrations were measured for 40 children after 2 weeks and for 9 children after 2 to 5 months of treatment with a didanosine-lamivudine-efavirenz combination. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed with NONMEM. The link between the maximal concentration of the drug in plasma (Cmax), the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), and the decrease in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 RNA levels after 12 months of treatment was evaluated. The threshold AUC that improved efficacy was determined by the use of a Wilcoxon test for HIV RNA, and an optimized dosing schedule was simulated. Didanosine pharmacokinetics was best described by a one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination. The apparent clearance and volume of distribution were higher for tablets, probably due to a lower bioavailability with tablets than with pediatric powder. The decrease in the viral load after 12 months of treatment was significantly correlated with the didanosine AUC and Cmax (P < or = 0.02) during the first weeks of treatment. An AUC of >0.60 mg/liter x h was significantly linked to a greater decrease in the viral load (a decrease of 3 log10 versus 2.4 log10 copies/ml; P = 0.03) than that with a lower AUC. A didanosine dose of 360 mg/m2 administered as tablets should be a more appropriate dose than 240 mg/m2 to improve efficacy for these children. However, data on adverse events with this dosage are missing.

Indexed as

AdolescentAfrica, WesternAnti-HIV AgentsChildChild, PreschoolDidanosineDrug Administration ScheduleHIV InfectionsHumansTreatment OutcomeAnti-HIV AgentsDidanosine

Identifiers

PMID19581461
PMCPMC2764159
OpenAlexW2151589485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.