Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19580884›Full record

ReviewDrug discovery today2009

The impact of synthetic biology on drug discovery.

Wilfried Weber, Martin Fussenegger

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drug discovery today, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Synergistic Synthetic Biology: Units in Concert.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2013
    Review
  9. Revisiting lab-on-a-chip technology for drug discovery.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2012
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Wilfried WeberCentre for Biological Signalling Studies (bioss), Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Engesserstrasse 4b, D-79108 Freiburg, Germany.
Martin Fussenegger

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of synthetic biology is holding great hopes for providing solutions to the unmet needs of humankind. This review article describes how synthetic biology can deliver on this promise in the field of drug discovery by providing novel opportunities throughout the entire drug discovery process. Synthetic biology tools enable disease mechanisms and target identification to be elucidated and also provide avenues to discover small chemotherapeutic molecules or design novel biopharmaceuticals. Furthermore, synthetic biologists can design cost-effective microbial production processes for complex natural products, which could help overcome global drug shortages. These impressive advances have been achieved in only a few years, and are an indicator for the potential of synthetic biology.

Indexed as

BiotechnologyDrug DiscoverySystems BiologyAnimalsAnti-Infective AgentsAntineoplastic AgentsBiological ProductsDrug DesignHumansMolecular StructureAnti-Infective AgentsAntineoplastic AgentsBiological Products

Identifiers

PMID19580884
PMCPMC7108258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.