ArticleBiophysical journal2009
Molecular accessibility in relation to cell surface topography and compression against a flat substrate.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multilayer dual-porosity 3D printed scaffolds to recreate the anisotropic microenvironment of the hyaline cartilage.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- Endothelial Glycocalyx Layer Properties and Its Ability to Limit Leukocyte Adhesion.Biophysical journal · 2020Article
- Endothelial Surface Protrusion by a Point Force.Biophysical journal · 2016Article
- Cell surface topography is a regulator of molecular interactions during chemokine-induced neutrophil spreading.Biophysical journal · 2014Article
- Dynamics of adhesion molecule domains on neutrophil membranes: surfing the dynamic cell topography.European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2013Article
- Cell adhesion molecule distribution relative to neutrophil surface topography assessed by TIRFM.Biophysical journal · 2009Article
- Use of TIRF to Monitor T-Lymphocyte Membrane Dynamics with Submicrometer and Subsecond Resolution.Cellular and molecular bioengineeringArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The recruitment of cells to the vascular wall in vivo or the capture of cell subpopulations at the surface of a fabricated device requires the formation of bonds between specific molecular pairs on the cell and the substrate. The ability of a molecule to form a bond depends critically on its localization relative to the cell surface topography. In this report, we present a framework for the quantitative assessment of molecular availability that accounts for the deformability of the cell surface and the balance of forces in the interface, as well as the variability of surface protrusion lengths and the preference for molecules to reside at or away from the tips of surface projections. We also examined how molecular availability should change with increasing compression of the cell against the substrate. Finally, we convolved the distribution of molecules at the interface with a decaying evanescent excitation to predict the fluorescence intensity in total internal reflectance fluorescence microscopy, which can provide a quantitative measure of the relative availability of different molecules at a cell-substrate interface. Model predictions show good agreement with measurements of fluorescence intensity of different molecules labeled fluorescently on the surface of a human neutrophil compressed against a glass surface.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.