ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2009
Natural history of CKD stage 4 and 5 patients following referral to renal management clinic.
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prospects for lithium treated patients with severe renal impairment.International journal of bipolar disorders · 2025Article
- Urinary Liver-Type Fatty Acid Binding Protein, a Biomarker for Disease Progression, Dialysis and Overall Mortality in Chronic Kidney Disease.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Chronic kidney disease, risk of readmission, and progression to end-stage renal disease in 519,387 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.JTCVS open · 2022Article
- Multidisciplinary Team Care Delays the Initiation of Renal Replacement Therapy in Diabetes: A Five-year Prospective, Single-center Study.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2021Observational
- Effect of multidisciplinary care of dialysis initiation for outpatients with chronic kidney disease.International urology and nephrology · 2021Article
- Type 2 diabetes treatment and progression of chronic kidney disease in Italian family practice.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2019Article
- Temporal validation of the CT-PIRP prognostic model for mortality and renal replacement therapy initiation in chronic kidney disease patients.BMC nephrology · 2019Article
- Usefulness of multidisciplinary care to prevent worsening renal function in chronic kidney disease.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2019Observational
- A perspective on chronic kidney disease progression.American journal of physiology. Renal physiology · 2017Review
- Chronic kidney disease progression is mainly associated with non-recovery of acute kidney injury.Journal of nephrology · 2015Observational
- Variability in estimated glomerular filtration rate values is a risk factor in chronic kidney disease progression among patients with diabetes.BMC nephrology · 2015Article
- Chronic kidney disease prediction is an inexact science: The concept of "progressors" and "nonprogressors".World journal of nephrology · 2014Review
- In-hospital mortality in patients with renal dysfunction admitted for myocardial infarction: the Emilia-Romagna region of Italy database of hospital admissions.International urology and nephrology · 2013Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCKD patients referred to a renal management clinic are looked after by a multidisciplinary team whose care may improve outcome and delay the progression of kidney disease. This paper describes our experience and the results obtained in 940 patients with CKD stage 4 and 5 patients from two renal management clinics (RMC). SUBJECTS AND
methodsWe collected and analyzed the data from 940 patients with CKD stage 4 and 5 at the RMCs of the Toronto General Hospital (TGH), University Health Network and The Scarborough General Hospital (TSH) from January 2000 to November 2007. Inclusion criteria for the study required at least three measurements of serum creatinine over a minimum follow-up of 6 months. We calculated the change of slope of the estimated GFR by linear regression analysis. The slopes were further subdivided into five groups: improved eGFR (eGFR slope >or=+5 ml/min/year); mild improvement (slope >+1 to <+5 ml/min/year); stable (slope <+1 to >-1 ml/min/year); slow progression (i.e., deterioration; slope <-1 to >-5 ml/min/year) and rapid progression (slope >-5 ml/min/year).
resultsDuring a median follow-up of 1.57 year (range 0.5-8.7 year) of stage 4 patients, eGFR improved in 10.6%, showed mild improvement in 24.2%, was stable in 27.5%, showed slow progression in 28.8% and rapid progression in 8.9% of patients. During a median follow-up of 1.4 year (range 0.5-8 year) of CKD stage 5 patients, eGFR improved in only 1.3%, showed mild improvement in 4.3%, remained stable in 35.6%; showed slow progression in 19.7% and rapid progression in 39.1%. Between the two hospitals (TGH and TSH) there was a statistically significant difference in the number of visits per year for CKD stage 4 patients during the first, second and third year. However, the number of visits per year had no effect on the rate of decline. On univariate analysis, factors predicting non-progression in eGFR slope were eGFR at referral, the use of ACE inhibitors-ARBs and absence of cardiovascular disease. However, in logistic multivariate regression analysis, after adjusting for confounding factors only the eGFR at referral and ACE inhibitors-ARBs were independent factors for non-progression in eGFR. A significant percentage of CKD stage 4 patients attending a renal management clinic (RMC) showed non-progression or improvement in their kidney function. Although only few stage 5 CKD patients had improvement in their eGFR, 32% of them maintained their eGFR on conservative treatment for over 2 years delaying the initiation of dialysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19578968What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.