Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19578178›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2009

Resistant mutants of Mycobacterium tuberculosis selected in vitro do not reflect the in vivo mechanism of isoniazid resistance.

Indra L Bergval, Anja R J Schuitema, Paul R Klatser, Richard M Anthony

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Inhibitors of the Thioesterase Activity ofACS infectious diseases · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Frontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  12. Drug Degradation Caused byAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2022
    Article
  13. Evolution ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Identification of novel scaffolds targeting Mycobacterium tuberculosis.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2019
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Chemical disarming of isoniazid resistance inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Indra L BergvalKIT Biomedical Research, Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. i.bergval@kit.nl
Anja R J Schuitema
Paul R Klatser
Richard M Anthony
Royal Tropical Institute · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe high prevalence of isoniazid-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis is often explained by a high mutation rate for this trait, although detailed information to support this theory is absent. We studied the development of isoniazid resistance in vitro, making use of a laboratory strain of M. tuberculosis.

methodsSpontaneous isoniazid-resistant mutants were characterized by molecular methods allowing identification of the most commonly encountered resistance-conferring mutations. Additionally, we determined the in vitro mutation rates for isoniazid and rifampicin resistance, and characterized the genome of a triple-resistant strain.

resultsResults confirm that the in vitro mutation rate for isoniazid resistance (3.2 x 10(-7) mutations/cell division) is much higher than the rate for rifampicin resistance (9.8 x 10(-9) mutations/cell division). However, in the majority of the in vitro mutants katG was partially or completely deleted and neither of the two most common in vivo mutations, katG-S315T or inhA-C(-)15T, were found in 120 isogenic mutants. This implies that clinically prevalent resistance mutations were present in <0.8% of isoniazid-resistant strains selected in vitro (95% CI 0%-2.5%). The triple-resistant strain had acquired isoniazid resistance via a 49 kbp deletion, which included katG. Apart from previously identified resistance-conferring mutations, three additional point mutations were acquired during sequential selection steps.

conclusionsThese outcomes demonstrate that the in vivo mechanism of isoniazid resistance is not reflected by in vitro experiments. We therefore conclude that the high in vitro mutation rate for isoniazid resistance is not a satisfactory explanation for the fact that isoniazid monoresistance is significantly more widespread than monoresistance to rifampicin.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialMutationSelection, GeneticAntitubercular AgentsBacterial ProteinsCatalaseDNA, BacterialDNA Mutational AnalysisHumansInhibinsIsoniazidMycobacterium tuberculosisPoint MutationRifampinSequence DeletionAntitubercular AgentsBacterial ProteinsCatalaseDNA, Bacterialinhibin-alpha subunitInhibinsIsoniazidkatG protein, Mycobacterium tuberculosisRifampin

Identifiers

PMID19578178
PMCPMC2724981
OpenAlexW2147109487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.