ReviewJournal of lipid research2009
Contributions of quantitative proteomics to understanding membrane microdomains.
Review in Journal of lipid research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- A sensitive S-Trap-based approach to the analysis of T cell lipid raft proteome.Journal of lipid research · 2020Article
- Peripheral myelin protein 22 preferentially partitions into ordered phase membrane domains.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- Identification of caveolar resident proteins in ventricular myocytes using a quantitative proteomic approach: dynamic changes in caveolar composition following adrenoceptor activation.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2015Article
- Direct purification of detergent-insoluble membranes from Medicago truncatula root microsomes: comparison between floatation and sedimentation.BMC plant biology · 2014Article
- Identification of dynamic changes in proteins associated with the cellular cytoskeleton after exposure to okadaic acid.Marine drugs · 2013Article
- Article
- Differential impact of caveolae and caveolin-1 scaffolds on the membrane raft proteome.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2011Article
- Shiga toxin glycosphingolipid receptors in microvascular and macrovascular endothelial cells: differential association with membrane lipid raft microdomains.Journal of lipid research · 2011Article
- Membrane sphingolipids as essential molecular signals for Bacteroides survival in the intestine.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2011Article
- Quantitative proteomics of caveolin-1-regulated proteins: characterization of polymerase i and transcript release factor/CAVIN-1 IN endothelial cells.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Membrane microdomains, e.g., lipid rafts and caveolae, are crucial cell surface organelles responsible for many cellular signaling and communication events, which makes the characterization of their proteomes both interesting and valuable. They are large cellular complexes comprised of specific proteins and lipids, yet they are simple enough in composition to be amenable to modern LC/MS/MS methods for proteomics. However, the proteomic characterization of membrane microdomains by traditional qualitative mass spectrometry is insufficient for distinguishing true components of the microdomains from copurifying contaminants or for evaluating dynamic changes in the proteome compositions. In this review, we discuss the contributions quantitative proteomics has made to our understanding of the biology of membrane microdomains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.