ArticleBioorganic & medicinal chemistry2009
Identification, structure-activity relationships and molecular modeling of potent triamine and piperazine opioid ligands.
Article in Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Synthesis of Diazacyclic and Triazacyclic Small-Molecule Libraries Using Vicinal Chiral Diamines Generated from Modified Short Peptides and Their Application for Drug Discovery.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Ligand/kappa-opioid receptor interactions: insights from the X-ray crystal structure.European journal of medicinal chemistry · 2013Article
- Integrating computational and mixture-based screening of combinatorial libraries.Journal of molecular modeling · 2011Article
- Comprehensive survey of chemical libraries for drug discovery and chemical biology: 2009.Journal of combinatorial chemistry · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Opioid receptors are important targets for pain management. Here, we report the synthesis and biological evaluation of three positional scanning combinatorial libraries, consisting of linear triamines and piperazines. A highly potent (14 nM) and selective (IC(50(mu))/IC(50(kappa))=71; IC(50(delta))/IC(50(kappa))=714) triamine for the kappa-opioid receptor was found. In addition, non-selective mu-kappa binders were obtained, with binding affinities of 54 nM and 22 nM for mu- and kappa-opioid receptors, respectively. Structure-activity relationships of each subset are described. 3D molecular alignments based on shape similarity to internal and external query molecules were carried out. For the combinatorial chemistry dataset studied here a 1.3 similarity cut-off value was observed to be efficient in the rocs-based alignment method. Interactions from the overlays analyzed in the binding sites of homology models of the receptors revealed specific substitution patterns for enhancing binding affinity in the piperazine series. Pharmacophore modeling of the compounds found from the three combinatorial libraries was also performed. The pharmacophore model indicated that the important feature for receptor binding activity with the mu-receptor was the presence of at least one hydrogen bond acceptor and one aromatic hydrophobic group. Whereas for the kappa-receptor two binding modes emerged with one set of compounds employing the hydrogen bond acceptor and aromatic hydrophobic group, and a second set possibly via interactions with the receptor by hydrophobic and ionic salt-bridges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.