Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19575670›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of cell and developmental biology2010

Trafficking to the ciliary membrane: how to get across the periciliary diffusion barrier?

Maxence V Nachury, E Scott Seeley, Hua Jin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of cell and developmental biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 282 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
282citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

282 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Proteomics Approaches Used to Investigate Age Related Macular Degeneration.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

222 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maxence V NachuryDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305-5345, USA. nachury@stanford.edu
E Scott Seeley
Hua Jin

Funding

Quality control of the primary cilium proteomeR01GM089933 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Maxence V Nachury · 2010 to 2026
$5.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS 1R01GM089933-01NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM089933
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The primary cilium organizes numerous signal transduction cascades, and an understanding of signaling receptor trafficking to cilia is now emerging. A defining feature of cilia is the periciliary diffusion barrier that separates the ciliary and plasma membranes. Although lateral transport through this barrier may take place, polarized exocytosis to the base of the cilium has been the prevailing model for delivering membrane proteins to cilia. Key players for this polarized exocytosis model include the GTPases Rab8 and Rab11, the exocyst, and possibly the intraflagellar tranport machinery. In turn, the sorting of membrane proteins to cilia critically relies on the recognition of ciliary targeting signals by sorting machines such as the BBSome coat complex or the GTPase Arf4. Finally, some proteins need to exit from cilia, and ubiquitination may regulate this step. The stage is now set to dissect the interplay between signaling and regulated trafficking to and from cilia.

Indexed as

Signal TransductionAnimalsCell MembraneCiliaEukaryotaExocytosisHumansIntracellular MembranesMembrane ProteinsPhotoreceptor Cells, VertebrateProtein TransportMembrane Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19575670
PMCPMC2952038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.