Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19575639›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of cell and developmental biology2009

Membrane traffic within the Golgi apparatus.

Benjamin S Glick, Akihiko Nakano

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of cell and developmental biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 185 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
185citing papers in PubMed
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

185 citing papers in PubMed, 351 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Mechanical Cues Regulate Cargo Sorting and Export at the Golgi.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

125 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Benjamin S GlickDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA. bsglick@uchicago.edu
Akihiko Nakano
Tokyo University of Science · JPUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

THE TRANSITIONAL ER-GOLGI SYSTEM IN BUDDING YEASTSR01GM061156 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI GLICK, BENJAMIN S · 2000 to 2012
$3.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM-61156NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM061156
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Newly synthesized secretory cargo molecules pass through the Golgi apparatus while resident Golgi proteins remain in the organelle. However, the pathways of membrane traffic within the Golgi are still uncertain. Most of the available data can be accommodated by the cisternal maturation model, which postulates that Golgi cisternae form de novo, carry secretory cargoes forward and ultimately disappear. The entry face of the Golgi receives material that has been exported from transitional endoplasmic reticulum sites, and the exit face of the Golgi is intimately connected with endocytic compartments. These conserved features are enhanced by cell-type-specific elaborations such as tubular connections between mammalian Golgi cisternae. Key mechanistic questions remain about the formation and maturation of Golgi cisternae, the recycling of resident Golgi proteins, the origins of Golgi compartmental identity, the establishment of Golgi architecture, and the roles of Golgi structural elements in membrane traffic.

Indexed as

AnimalsEndoplasmic ReticulumGolgi ApparatusIntracellular MembranesProtein TransportSecretory Pathway

Identifiers

PMID19575639
PMCPMC2877624
OpenAlexW2158535876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.